Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

socialindependocrat

(1,372 posts)
6. Freedom of choice vs. restrictive rules
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 04:34 PM
Mar 2012

I believe that the laws should be set up to allow people the freedom to persue their own happiness in life.
What I have seen, when the religious right tries to inject religious beliefs into the making of a law is that what they usually are asking is to limit the freedom of others to choose.
They have asked for contraception to be limited when there are others who would choose to use contraception and birth control.
I think that the chioce should be available to everyone and the people who choose not to use the service have the right not to use the service.

If we allow religious beliefs to limit people's chioce then I think it has gone too far.

If Sanatorium wants to tell people that he has religious odeals that means that he will appeal to the religious minded. BUT, when he says that if he is elected president that he will use his power to make laws that limit the choices of the American people then I say it would be an abuse of power.

I always say - If you want to make more restrictive laws - Go back to Europe!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Spiritual beliefs? Yes. Religion? Hell, no. kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #1
What makes a "spiritual" belief any different in this context... Silent3 Mar 2012 #4
People can HAVE their spiritual beliefs. They can't have laws that kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #12
This may be more complicated that it appears Thats my opinion Mar 2012 #13
I would ask why your spiritual beliefs lead to a proposition about health care. Jim__ Apr 2012 #18
Of course different people come to the same conclusion through differentd means. Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #23
Nice of you to pass judgement skepticscott Apr 2012 #19
People can HAVE their religious beliefs. They can't (or at least shouldn't) have laws that.. Silent3 Mar 2012 #15
Of course--spiritual beliefs are just another way of saying religious commitments. Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #16
I think the Constitutional balance is fair as well as a political football these days. pinto Mar 2012 #2
What is the difference rrneck Mar 2012 #3
Are these quesions for which you are looking for data? Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #24
I was looking for an answer. rrneck Apr 2012 #26
No Worried senior Mar 2012 #5
On the contrary izquierdista Mar 2012 #7
Well that certainly adds to an intelligent conversation Thats my opinion Mar 2012 #9
As much as Walls of Text. 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #17
Freedom of choice vs. restrictive rules socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #6
The issue you raise is political--and you are on target. Thats my opinion Mar 2012 #11
This notion is a relativiely new idea LARED Mar 2012 #8
Lots and lots of straw men...why? skepticscott Mar 2012 #10
Freedom of religion cannot exist without freedom from religion. laconicsax Mar 2012 #14
The obvious rrneck Apr 2012 #20
Don't hold your breath skepticscott Apr 2012 #21
Yep rrneck Apr 2012 #22
I answered your #3 Have a look --The last few words of this current post are "gotcha" words Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #25
I dont need a response. rrneck Apr 2012 #27
Amd by the way, rrneck Apr 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Is there a place for reli...»Reply #6