Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
10. Lots and lots of straw men...why?
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 06:09 PM
Mar 2012
what is the legal role of religion in political campaigns? Does a candidate have the Constitutional right to insert his or her private religious convictions into public pronouncements or campaign literature?

Come on, now. Are you just being deliberately obtuse in even asking this question, trying to imply the straw man that mean old atheists and secularists have suggested that they don't? Of course they do, and you know that well, as well as you know that NO ONE and NO GROUP has ever suggested that the Constitution restricts what political candidates who are private individuals may say or write as part of their campaigns with regard to religion. The First Amendment is a restriction on laws and policies enacted by elected and appointed government officials, period.

On the other hand, there are those who decry the incursion of such issues into the national debate. Would they have tried to keep Martin Luther King Jr. out of the civil rights struggle because he was an avowed Christian who believed that what he stood for flowed from his faith? Had his voice been eliminated on that basis, we would never have had a voting rights law.

Is there an argument from any quarter that if a policy is promoted by anyone or any group motivated in any way by religion, then that policy must be bad and should be rejected? Of course not. Just another straw man. The argument, if you'd cared to state it accurately, is that if a policy wouldn't be considered or can't be justified without using religion or "religious values" (whatever those are), then it has no place in a Constitutionally mandated secular government. The policies that King and those with him tried to promote could be, while those that creationists try to promote can't be, so your analogy is bullshit.

And you, like so many others, weep and wail about religion being pushed out of the "public square", but you get your shorts in a knot when religious beliefs and convictions are held to the same standards of scrutiny and criticism that apply to all other ideas in the public square. If you want to keep your beliefs to yourself or among like-minded believers, fine and dandy. But if you're going to throw them out here, or into public policy debates, then they are fair game and not immune from the harshest criticism.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Spiritual beliefs? Yes. Religion? Hell, no. kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #1
What makes a "spiritual" belief any different in this context... Silent3 Mar 2012 #4
People can HAVE their spiritual beliefs. They can't have laws that kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #12
This may be more complicated that it appears Thats my opinion Mar 2012 #13
I would ask why your spiritual beliefs lead to a proposition about health care. Jim__ Apr 2012 #18
Of course different people come to the same conclusion through differentd means. Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #23
Nice of you to pass judgement skepticscott Apr 2012 #19
People can HAVE their religious beliefs. They can't (or at least shouldn't) have laws that.. Silent3 Mar 2012 #15
Of course--spiritual beliefs are just another way of saying religious commitments. Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #16
I think the Constitutional balance is fair as well as a political football these days. pinto Mar 2012 #2
What is the difference rrneck Mar 2012 #3
Are these quesions for which you are looking for data? Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #24
I was looking for an answer. rrneck Apr 2012 #26
No Worried senior Mar 2012 #5
On the contrary izquierdista Mar 2012 #7
Well that certainly adds to an intelligent conversation Thats my opinion Mar 2012 #9
As much as Walls of Text. 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #17
Freedom of choice vs. restrictive rules socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #6
The issue you raise is political--and you are on target. Thats my opinion Mar 2012 #11
This notion is a relativiely new idea LARED Mar 2012 #8
Lots and lots of straw men...why? skepticscott Mar 2012 #10
Freedom of religion cannot exist without freedom from religion. laconicsax Mar 2012 #14
The obvious rrneck Apr 2012 #20
Don't hold your breath skepticscott Apr 2012 #21
Yep rrneck Apr 2012 #22
I answered your #3 Have a look --The last few words of this current post are "gotcha" words Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #25
I dont need a response. rrneck Apr 2012 #27
Amd by the way, rrneck Apr 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Is there a place for reli...»Reply #10