Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: "Dogs in Heaven? Pope Francis Leaves Pearly Gate Open" [View all]whathehell
(30,333 posts)57. Wow...Is that the best you've got?
Don't quit your day job, genius.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
208 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sure, the ones written that intentionally misconstrue or misrepresent his words DO read like that
cleanhippie
Dec 2014
#5
Sure if we want a society of grownups who believe in fairy tales it is harmless.
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2014
#31
Um, you've not noticed that everyone doesn't considers the concept of God a "fairy tale"?
whathehell
Dec 2014
#48
Actually lets take a look at the crapfest of voodoo bullshit el popey was wading through.
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2014
#62
Maybe some could bag the snark long enough to appreciate the pope's kindness to a grieving child..
whathehell
Dec 2014
#7
Actually, I'm less inclined than you, it seems, to decide what "we should all do".
whathehell
Dec 2014
#102
I alerted on its appearance in LBN, because it's not a news story
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2014
#103
Sorry, but "we" are not all atheists here, much as that clearly annoys you, and
whathehell
Dec 2014
#120
I encourage everyone to read post #148, to get the feel of whathehell's attitude
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2014
#158
For almost all of them they are doing so while munching away on one of these animals whose rights
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2014
#127
Excerpt that was Paul VI who did that, some time in the 60s or 70s
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2014
#87
For what it's worth, I believe they are indeed going the same place you are.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2014
#41
For an example of being 'a tad less dickish', please see #148 (nt)
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2014
#160
We'll add "the status of pets and farm animals in the afterlife" to the list of Serious Theology
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2014
#163
No, I know absolutely nothing about it, and wouldn't dare speculate on the size.
cbayer
Dec 2014
#35
"My experience is that there are more angry Christians" -- Not on this board!
whathehell
Dec 2014
#159
"You're free of course to keep the popular view, no matter how incorrect that may be."
Lordquinton
Dec 2014
#111
Frankly, I'd prefer to reread Aristotle than to read a comment dismissing his ideas, for any reason,
rug
Dec 2014
#167
I see what your problem is. You don't know the difference between phrenology and theolgy.
rug
Dec 2014
#133
No, dimensions, however many there may be, are natural phenomena, subject to natural examination.
rug
Dec 2014
#171
This is one of those issues where the Church is mostly silent on it, so individual Catholics...
Humanist_Activist
Dec 2014
#182
How is my commenting on what you stated as a belief any more a form of "pushing"...
Silent3
Dec 2014
#203