Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
90. What about them?
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 02:36 PM
Dec 2014
You must be referring to all those millions of Christians who pray "Our FATHER who art in HEAVEN..." Every freaking Sunday. They seem to be pretty well fixated on the sky daddy image of God.


Where's the Sky Daddy here?




17 May 1968 9 people walked into a Selective Service Office, took hundreds of draft files from a cabinet, took them outside, doused them with homemade napalm and burned them in the name of peace.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What about mosquitos? Ron Obvious Dec 2014 #1
One of the issues I always had with the concept of heaven cbayer Dec 2014 #4
I think all those little uncomplicated souls get recycled back to earth. hunter Dec 2014 #26
So they do promote Wall Street Bankers in the after life! iscooterliberally Dec 2014 #53
Small steps. hunter Dec 2014 #56
Shit. bvf Dec 2014 #2
Centipedes are Satan's pets. Goblinmonger Dec 2014 #6
I am completely on board with that. n/t. bvf Dec 2014 #23
Just for you: muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #96
Aw, that was sweet of you, Muriel. bvf Dec 2014 #115
Me too!! Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2014 #201
That's cool and harmless. cbayer Dec 2014 #3
Sure, the ones written that intentionally misconstrue or misrepresent his words DO read like that cleanhippie Dec 2014 #5
Harmless and absurd aren't mutually exclusive. Silent3 Dec 2014 #12
So what? If you don't believe in heaven, it makes no difference. cbayer Dec 2014 #20
Spending time with sick people doesn't require... Silent3 Dec 2014 #21
It most certainly require that at times, but it's all about definitions. cbayer Dec 2014 #27
Please do provide the necessary unprejudiced definitions... Silent3 Dec 2014 #70
Is there a problem with making the world safer for nicey-nice comforting cbayer Dec 2014 #71
Yes, there is a problem with that... Silent3 Dec 2014 #73
It's always such a delight talking with you Silent3. cbayer Dec 2014 #74
LOL.. whathehell Dec 2014 #75
Be kind. His polling place was recently moved to a church and cbayer Dec 2014 #76
Oh the horror! whathehell Dec 2014 #78
No, when she does it, it's tolerant and wonderful. trotsky Dec 2014 #22
and "comforting words for children" and "degraded" are not synonymous. whathehell Dec 2014 #44
Nor did what I posted depend on those words being synonymous... Silent3 Dec 2014 #72
Sure if we want a society of grownups who believe in fairy tales it is harmless. Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #31
Um, you've not noticed that everyone doesn't considers the concept of God a "fairy tale"? whathehell Dec 2014 #48
A fairy tale is a fairy tale independent of the existence of Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #49
Wow...Is that the best you've got? whathehell Dec 2014 #57
Actually lets take a look at the crapfest of voodoo bullshit el popey was wading through. Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #62
Let's not. Anyone who claims to want to 'discuss' something he's already whathehell Dec 2014 #64
Oh, it's not harmless. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #37
Maybe some could bag the snark long enough to appreciate the pope's kindness to a grieving child.. whathehell Dec 2014 #7
Really? Like that took a lot for him? Goblinmonger Dec 2014 #11
Now that is a great idea! Let's give it a try. cbayer Dec 2014 #25
"Kindness"? bvf Dec 2014 #18
Yes, look it up. whathehell Dec 2014 #40
So did the pope lie to him? Lordquinton Dec 2014 #58
I'm not aware that there was any "dogma" regarding it to begin with.. whathehell Dec 2014 #61
The article states that it's a point of debate in the church Lordquinton Dec 2014 #80
The fact that it's still being debated whathehell Dec 2014 #82
Grown adults debate this. bvf Dec 2014 #91
Yeah.. whathehell Dec 2014 #95
But the pope is not debating the rights of animals muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #97
You can quote the pope's statement, but your dismissive assumption about whathehell Dec 2014 #98
So it's something we should all ignore, then muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #99
Actually, I'm less inclined than you, it seems, to decide what "we should all do". whathehell Dec 2014 #102
I alerted on its appearance in LBN, because it's not a news story muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #103
Tell it to the OP, dear, and whoever published the "not really news" story whathehell Dec 2014 #121
We're not talking about animal rights here. bvf Dec 2014 #114
Sorry, but "we" are not all atheists here, much as that clearly annoys you, and whathehell Dec 2014 #120
Uh, I didn't bring up animal rights. bvf Dec 2014 #123
Uh, I don't believe I indicated I had a problem with the topic, whathehell Dec 2014 #125
So how do you imagine bvf Dec 2014 #129
My dear, please check my posts whathehell Dec 2014 #135
I've been around long enough bvf Dec 2014 #136
No-one here is your 'dear' - not bvf, and not me muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #143
Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #148
I encourage everyone to read post #148, to get the feel of whathehell's attitude muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #158
Almost seems as if there's a template. n/t. bvf Dec 2014 #172
Well unfortunately now skepticscott Dec 2014 #190
It is edhopper Dec 2014 #193
Wow, nice. n/t trotsky Dec 2014 #208
And what about teddy bears and other stuffed animals? Silent3 Dec 2014 #205
For almost all of them they are doing so while munching away on one of these animals whose rights Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #127
LOL..You have stats on Vegan Catholics vs. Vegan Everyone Else? whathehell Dec 2014 #131
Is the pope a vegetarian? Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #151
Uh, wrong pope.. whathehell Dec 2014 #154
A spiritual context? phil89 Dec 2014 #156
So if he stated it was true he would be attempting to change said dogma Lordquinton Dec 2014 #110
Whatever, Lord, lol.. whathehell Dec 2014 #119
He sometimes even preached to them: struggle4progress Dec 2014 #106
Excerpt that was Paul VI who did that, some time in the 60s or 70s muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #87
Not going to happen. It's a sport. cbayer Dec 2014 #24
So, uh, when you post that picture to badmouth others... trotsky Dec 2014 #29
I like that. (nt) stone space Dec 2014 #30
Another quote bvf Dec 2014 #33
What about what we say about the IDEAS that other people hold? AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #39
There are ways to comfort grieving people without lying to them. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #38
Apparently you couldn't skepticscott Dec 2014 #191
I believe my pets are coming with me to heaven. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #8
For what it's worth, I believe they are indeed going the same place you are. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #41
Yes. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #43
Here? Silent3 Dec 2014 #206
Well, you can't leave the Pearly Gates open like that! TlalocW Dec 2014 #9
Pearly Dog Doors? n/t Goblinmonger Dec 2014 #10
Call the Baja Men, we just found the man they are looking for Lordquinton Dec 2014 #59
Trosqui (2/2/2000 - 11/26/2014) stone space Dec 2014 #13
I am so sorry for your loss! hrmjustin Dec 2014 #14
Thank you. stone space Dec 2014 #15
It is so hard to lose a pet. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #16
What a little cutie that guy was. n/t Goblinmonger Dec 2014 #17
Beautiful. I have 3 rescue dogs. benz380 Dec 2014 #55
So sorry for the loss of your pup. okasha Dec 2014 #77
If only the "New Atheists" could be more intellectual. trotsky Dec 2014 #19
If only the Old and New could be more tolerant of the beliefs of others.. whathehell Dec 2014 #45
Yeah, *we're* the intolerant ones. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #47
For an example of being 'a tad less dickish', please see #148 (nt) muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #160
We'll add "the status of pets and farm animals in the afterlife" to the list of Serious Theology muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #163
Wow. After millions of years of past creatures, dinosaurs Lint Head Dec 2014 #28
Wow. That's a really narrow POV. cbayer Dec 2014 #32
Wow! You sure are knowledgeable about the specifics of Heaven and the Lint Head Dec 2014 #34
No, I know absolutely nothing about it, and wouldn't dare speculate on the size. cbayer Dec 2014 #35
Wow. bvf Dec 2014 #36
Where did I say I don't believe? Nowhere. You are making Lint Head Dec 2014 #50
I wasn't responding to you. bvf Dec 2014 #67
I see. I apologize. Lint Head Dec 2014 #81
Honest mistake. No foul. n/t bvf Dec 2014 #83
What did you expect, LOL? whathehell Dec 2014 #46
+2000 Lint Head Dec 2014 #51
Linthead, I think you may have misunderstood.. whathehell Dec 2014 #122
+3000 Lint Head Dec 2014 #142
"My experience is that there are more angry Christians" -- Not on this board! whathehell Dec 2014 #159
You must be referring to all those millions of Christians skepticscott Dec 2014 #66
Yes. bvf Dec 2014 #84
Gee, I missed the part that said "Our Father who art in the sky". rug Dec 2014 #86
Think christian iconography. bvf Dec 2014 #89
Think what you're saying. rug Dec 2014 #93
"You're free of course to keep the popular view, no matter how incorrect that may be." Lordquinton Dec 2014 #111
You know, changing my words to reflect what's in your head doesn't really work. rug Dec 2014 #126
Nobody changed your words. bvf Dec 2014 #183
You mean like, "You mean like . . . ." rug Dec 2014 #185
I am. bvf Dec 2014 #112
Are you certain or uncertain of your own view? rug Dec 2014 #130
As certain as science. bvf Dec 2014 #132
Science has no opinion on the attributes of heaven. rug Dec 2014 #134
Precisely. bvf Dec 2014 #137
Then your certainty must rest on something else. rug Dec 2014 #138
Why do you say that? bvf Dec 2014 #141
Because you agreed science is mute on the topic of this thread. rug Dec 2014 #144
Science is mute? bvf Dec 2014 #145
Science is mute on imaginary topics edhopper Dec 2014 #146
Science is mute on topics it is incompetent to address. rug Dec 2014 #150
So who is competent edhopper Dec 2014 #152
People who approach the subject honestly. rug Dec 2014 #153
Where do these honest people edhopper Dec 2014 #155
Philosophy, scriptures, physics, metaphysics. rug Dec 2014 #157
Which part of Aristotle edhopper Dec 2014 #161
Start with Book XII, substances and the prime mover. rug Dec 2014 #164
I think the idea of the prime mover edhopper Dec 2014 #166
Frankly, I'd prefer to reread Aristotle than to read a comment dismissing his ideas, for any reason, rug Dec 2014 #167
I have read Aridtotle edhopper Dec 2014 #175
Have a nice stroll. rug Dec 2014 #177
I explained my problem with your approach edhopper Dec 2014 #178
Life is full of dashed hopes. rug Dec 2014 #179
They might have been edhopper Dec 2014 #180
Of course it is on this topic. rug Dec 2014 #147
What about them? stone space Dec 2014 #90
You posted this same thing in reply skepticscott Dec 2014 #100
Do I have to remind you what you were whining about? stone space Dec 2014 #105
Do I have to remind you what I was responding to? skepticscott Dec 2014 #107
The video doesn't mention any "Sky Daddies". stone space Dec 2014 #108
Tell you what skepticscott Dec 2014 #109
OK, so you have no answer. stone space Dec 2014 #118
Sorry, were you still under the misbegotten impression skepticscott Dec 2014 #140
Our FATHER (daddy) who art in HEAVEN (sky) Silent3 Dec 2014 #186
Let me guess. They're waiting for a bolt of lightning... stone space Dec 2014 #192
That some people often recite prayers as if they were magical incantations... Silent3 Dec 2014 #194
Don't forget the billion-billion-trillions of bacteria. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #42
LOLOLOLOLOL! Lint Head Dec 2014 #52
Since this is DU and not a subreddit, this thread notwithstanding, I'll add this. rug Dec 2014 #54
What does it mean to me personally? Silent3 Dec 2014 #69
It is easy to dismiss but there should be a core understanding of it. rug Dec 2014 #85
Core understanding. Right. bvf Dec 2014 #88
Right. rug Dec 2014 #94
Right. bvf Dec 2014 #113
I see what your problem is. You don't know the difference between phrenology and theolgy. rug Dec 2014 #133
Perhaps you could enlighten me. bvf Dec 2014 #139
Hint: one concerns bumps. rug Dec 2014 #149
And...? bvf Dec 2014 #169
The path to enlightenment is trod by one's own feet. rug Dec 2014 #170
Been there. bvf Dec 2014 #174
There is a theory you may or may not have heard whathehell Dec 2014 #162
Hmm, outside of science fiction, no, I haven't. rug Dec 2014 #165
Some who believe in an afterlife whathehell Dec 2014 #168
No, dimensions, however many there may be, are natural phenomena, subject to natural examination. rug Dec 2014 #171
Sorry, but many things which were thought "supernatural" whathehell Dec 2014 #173
Post hoc ergo propter hoc is not a convincing argument. rug Dec 2014 #176
I'm not making a post hoc argument whathehell Dec 2014 #181
And it was Pope Paul VI, who died 36 years ago, who said it muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #60
It is part of the doctrine of papal in full of bullity. Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #63
The Bull muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #65
Thank you for the clarification. n/t Silent3 Dec 2014 #68
I saw the movie when I was 5. Socal31 Dec 2014 #79
How about making this a fun thread! I will start. cbayer Dec 2014 #92
Okay! bvf Dec 2014 #117
I love that toon Prophet 451 Dec 2014 #187
It's a pretty perfect toon in many ways. cbayer Dec 2014 #189
And as usual, with everything the pope says skepticscott Dec 2014 #101
Looks more the "progressive" pope haters here are more agitated. rug Dec 2014 #104
That's politics, for you. bvf Dec 2014 #116
I fuckin hate these PR Pope articles... MellowDem Dec 2014 #124
Awww.. whathehell Dec 2014 #128
It had everything to do with Blank Frank's New and Improved Image skepticscott Dec 2014 #184
The Pope believes a lot of heinous shit... MellowDem Dec 2014 #199
This is one of those issues where the Church is mostly silent on it, so individual Catholics... Humanist_Activist Dec 2014 #182
I firmly believe I will see my cats again Prophet 451 Dec 2014 #188
It's one thing to wishfully hope for such things... Silent3 Dec 2014 #195
I'm not asking you to believe it Prophet 451 Dec 2014 #196
I never thought you were asking me to believe. That's irrelevant. Silent3 Dec 2014 #197
Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #200
How is my commenting on what you stated as a belief any more a form of "pushing"... Silent3 Dec 2014 #203
Absence of evidence IS evidence of absence skepticscott Dec 2014 #198
I'll try to make this simple for you. Sareini Dec 2014 #204
Obviously you haven't any understanding skepticscott Dec 2014 #207
+1000 darkangel218 Dec 2014 #202
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»"Dogs in Heaven? Pop...»Reply #90