Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: "Dogs in Heaven? Pope Francis Leaves Pearly Gate Open" [View all]bvf
(6,604 posts)114. We're not talking about animal rights here.
I think you know that, but if you've interpreted this discussion the way your post implies, you should be out there demonstrating for Fido's "right" to eternal life.
Big
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
208 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sure, the ones written that intentionally misconstrue or misrepresent his words DO read like that
cleanhippie
Dec 2014
#5
Sure if we want a society of grownups who believe in fairy tales it is harmless.
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2014
#31
Um, you've not noticed that everyone doesn't considers the concept of God a "fairy tale"?
whathehell
Dec 2014
#48
Actually lets take a look at the crapfest of voodoo bullshit el popey was wading through.
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2014
#62
Maybe some could bag the snark long enough to appreciate the pope's kindness to a grieving child..
whathehell
Dec 2014
#7
Actually, I'm less inclined than you, it seems, to decide what "we should all do".
whathehell
Dec 2014
#102
I alerted on its appearance in LBN, because it's not a news story
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2014
#103
Sorry, but "we" are not all atheists here, much as that clearly annoys you, and
whathehell
Dec 2014
#120
I encourage everyone to read post #148, to get the feel of whathehell's attitude
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2014
#158
For almost all of them they are doing so while munching away on one of these animals whose rights
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2014
#127
Excerpt that was Paul VI who did that, some time in the 60s or 70s
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2014
#87
For what it's worth, I believe they are indeed going the same place you are.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2014
#41
For an example of being 'a tad less dickish', please see #148 (nt)
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2014
#160
We'll add "the status of pets and farm animals in the afterlife" to the list of Serious Theology
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2014
#163
No, I know absolutely nothing about it, and wouldn't dare speculate on the size.
cbayer
Dec 2014
#35
"My experience is that there are more angry Christians" -- Not on this board!
whathehell
Dec 2014
#159
"You're free of course to keep the popular view, no matter how incorrect that may be."
Lordquinton
Dec 2014
#111
Frankly, I'd prefer to reread Aristotle than to read a comment dismissing his ideas, for any reason,
rug
Dec 2014
#167
I see what your problem is. You don't know the difference between phrenology and theolgy.
rug
Dec 2014
#133
No, dimensions, however many there may be, are natural phenomena, subject to natural examination.
rug
Dec 2014
#171
This is one of those issues where the Church is mostly silent on it, so individual Catholics...
Humanist_Activist
Dec 2014
#182
How is my commenting on what you stated as a belief any more a form of "pushing"...
Silent3
Dec 2014
#203