Religion
In reply to the discussion: Did historical Jesus really exist? The evidence just doesn’t add up. [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Where we differ, is one of our positions requires faith, and one does not. You've chosen faith. Ok.
Rationality puts me in a different place, and on a lot more issues than just this one.
Interestingly, I don't have any 'givens' like that, but I do rely on a couple axioms, such as 'existence exists' (though I am aware that the universe may be a hologram at its most fundamental level, and I am ok with that possibility) or 'self ownership', but only because these things can be critically and rationally examined, challenged, and tested, even if the manner of test is 'acceptable as a working premise but unproven until falsified'.
I suppose your position on jesus is similar to my concept of an axiom. However, being that he was claimed to be a real historical character, as well as a supernaturally imbued biblical character, some of those things can be supported/refuted, where philosophical abstracts like self ownership, aren't.