Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
3. I don't like the term. It doesn't really describe anything.
Fri Dec 26, 2014, 05:57 PM
Dec 2014

The author that he is responding to makes an interesting distinction between atheists and atheists with specific beliefs. This makes sense to me, but the terminology remains clumsy.

Every movement has it's "firebrands" and they can play an important role, but they can also become liabilities at some point. The raging does garner attention, which can be good, but once it begins repelling allies, there is a problem.

I agree that the fundamentalists on both sides of this spectrum are trying to create a sad, dogmatic, and rigid system, and they often seem to want to do it just so they can be "right".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»OK, I’m an Atheist Fundam...»Reply #3