Religion
In reply to the discussion: 10 Things I wish the Atheists at DU knew about Theists at DU (at least this one) [View all]Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)I am not going to spend time finding some of the threads that I recall as offensive because it will do nothing to change the minds of anyone here. (See LostOne4Ever's post that I first commented on for examples that everyone has ignored to see why I am not going to bother.) I can say that right here on DU in the Religion group, I have seen excuses for keeping religious monuments on public land. Or if I remember, supporting the government giving land away to protect a religious monument. No big deal to many.
You accuse me of "joining in the chorus", as if there is some huge conspiracy. If there is, I have not been invited to the party. My opinions are my own. I may be guilty of not supporting people who stand solidly for total separation of church and state, and much of that is because I do not come into this group often. Somehow, I get sucked in when a post here hits a milestone---and at that time it is usually a free-for-all here by then. Maybe you should take a long break from this group, then come back with fresh eyes and you will see the dysfunction on both sides. Right now, you are in a clique where you only see certain posters as always right or always wrong.
An admission here: Before I started reading the Religion group, I was one of the atheists who was apathetic about anything to do with religion unless it affected me personally. But I have seen a treatment of atheists here, on a liberal site, that bothers me enough that I have gotten involved with atheist readings and sites. I had never heard of Dawkins or Harris or any of the other "famous" atheists because I didn't care. This all came from reading right here. I don't need a chorus. I see enough to upset me by reading some of the posts here.
Save any further lecture. It is only doing more damage.