Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
1. Two possibilities:
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 10:36 AM
Apr 2012

1) Properly
or
2) Badly


#1 would be to simply state that religion is a personal preference so the adherence
to any particular religious requirements is left purely up to the individual (within the
existing confines of the law of the host nation - UK in 2012).

#2 would be to fart around in a half-arsed attempt to satisfy everyone in every
single aspect that could possibly be covered under the blanket of "religion"
(even the mutually exclusive ones between different religions) and end up with
a collection of distracting failures that will simply add to the periodic global farce
known as "the Olympics".


The addition bonus of #1 is that it would apply equally to those of the major
faiths (the article referenced 10), those of any minor (yet still legal) faith and
those of no faith whatsoever without any discrimination or bias.

This leads me to suspect that they will actually go with option #2.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Two possibilities: Nihil Apr 2012 #1
Certainly some accommodations will need to be made. cbayer Apr 2012 #2
Does every team member from Israel follow religious doctrine? cleanhippie Apr 2012 #3
Strikes me that you'd end up with a four-day week (or less) if you adopted that approach. Nihil Apr 2012 #5
Very few religious believers have restrictions on what they can do on specific days or times. cbayer Apr 2012 #8
If it's so few then there is no need to make special arrangements is there? Nihil Apr 2012 #10
The article talks about some accommodations that have been easily made and cbayer Apr 2012 #11
The world record holder of the triple jump wouldn't compete on Sunday in the early 1990s muriel_volestrangler Apr 2012 #12
I recognize that there are exceptions, but as pointed out by others, most believers cbayer Apr 2012 #13
Consider the following hypothetical situation: trotsky Apr 2012 #6
I have an answer: ONLY ATHEISTS ... SamG Apr 2012 #15
Surely this is not the first time the Olympics have.. SamG Apr 2012 #4
Because we need to find religious persecution, even when it doesn't exist. cleanhippie Apr 2012 #7
Religious athletes must be the most persecuted people in SamG Apr 2012 #14
Wow. Please let the Israel olympic team know how you feel. cbayer Apr 2012 #16
So you are saying the German Olympics massacre happened because... SamG Apr 2012 #17
No, I was responding to your snarky statement about religious olympic atheletes cbayer Apr 2012 #19
The attack had everything to do with hatred, and SamG Apr 2012 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author SamG Apr 2012 #18
Good question. From the article it looks like they may be taking a unique approach. cbayer Apr 2012 #9
Not 'important' or 'controversial', so much as "tied in with a BBC comedy", I think muriel_volestrangler Apr 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»London 2012: How do the O...»Reply #1