Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Charlie Hebdo and its biting satire, explained in 9 of its most iconic covers [View all]trotsky
(49,533 posts)12. Why is it reasonable to expect "that violent reactions might occur"?
Since when is violence (in this case, murder) a reasonable reaction to being offended?
It's simply not the tool I would use to try to persuade people to think differently; I would have expected more anger and violence and that's what they got.
That sounds disturbingly similar to "They deserved it." That's not what you're saying, is it?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Charlie Hebdo and its biting satire, explained in 9 of its most iconic covers [View all]
cbayer
Jan 2015
OP
I am going to step up and defend cbayer--I don't think anyone is supporting MURDER.
MADem
Jan 2015
#27
But it's 'expected' and 'should have been anticipated' by the victims, according to some parties
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#35
You don't understand the culture behind the publication and it's history.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#6
You realize some of them were created in direct response to their offices being firebombed, right?
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#8
Also, you are making an uninformed snap judgment about a magazine making deadly serious satire about
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#9
I see the world as a schoolyard, people really behave like children, they are children, in fact.
NYC_SKP
Jan 2015
#14
You've already admitted you are missing cultural and linguistic context for the images/commentary in
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#26
I think what they've done might well do more harm than good. I'm not the only one who thinks so.
NYC_SKP
Jan 2015
#49
Marine Le Pen is the leader of the National Front. The one I just mentioned.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#57
Yes, by all means this is the fault of the people that drew and published the cartoons.
Goblinmonger
Jan 2015
#13
"It was careless, at the very least, to carry on in the way they did" - that is classic victim
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2015
#43
Free speech is great stuff and should never be viewed as in 'is it productive or not'.
Rex
Jan 2015
#48
His stance on this appears eerily similar to the "Did you see how she was dressed? She should've
cleanhippie
Jan 2015
#16
"Charbonnier had famously shrugged off threats, saying: 'I'd rather die standing than live kneeling"
NYC_SKP
Jan 2015
#44
The quote is attibuted to Spanish republican icon Dolores Ibarruri, 3 Sept., 1936:
NYC_SKP
Jan 2015
#61
I did not know that. I thought it was original to him, but I like it either way.
cbayer
Jan 2015
#62
Religions, like all other ideas, deserve criticism, satire, and, yes, our fearless disrespect.
PassingFair
Jan 2015
#55
The claim that pro gay artists were homophobic to defend religions which are homophobic
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2015
#66
Thank you for this, I do not appreciate them but understand them more. Thanks
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#67