Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Charlie Hebdo and its biting satire, explained in 9 of its most iconic covers [View all]NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)59. I appreciate your civility and respect.
I do.
Some seem to think I'm blaming the victims here, going so far as to say that it reminds them of blaming rape victims for dressing a certain way.
I don't respond, that's ludicrous.
The publishers and cartoonists and editors in this case were trying, at least, to do a public service in challenging fundamentalism and bigotry with sharp satire.
They chose to do it in ways I would not have, in ways I think might have done more harm than good.
They clearly understood the risks, and apparently accepted them and that's their choice.
I disagree with that choice largely because of the risk to others, but also because I don't think it's an effective strategy and could create more enemies.
Again, thank you for the added note.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Charlie Hebdo and its biting satire, explained in 9 of its most iconic covers [View all]
cbayer
Jan 2015
OP
I am going to step up and defend cbayer--I don't think anyone is supporting MURDER.
MADem
Jan 2015
#27
But it's 'expected' and 'should have been anticipated' by the victims, according to some parties
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#35
You don't understand the culture behind the publication and it's history.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#6
You realize some of them were created in direct response to their offices being firebombed, right?
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#8
Also, you are making an uninformed snap judgment about a magazine making deadly serious satire about
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#9
I see the world as a schoolyard, people really behave like children, they are children, in fact.
NYC_SKP
Jan 2015
#14
You've already admitted you are missing cultural and linguistic context for the images/commentary in
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#26
I think what they've done might well do more harm than good. I'm not the only one who thinks so.
NYC_SKP
Jan 2015
#49
Marine Le Pen is the leader of the National Front. The one I just mentioned.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#57
Yes, by all means this is the fault of the people that drew and published the cartoons.
Goblinmonger
Jan 2015
#13
"It was careless, at the very least, to carry on in the way they did" - that is classic victim
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2015
#43
Free speech is great stuff and should never be viewed as in 'is it productive or not'.
Rex
Jan 2015
#48
His stance on this appears eerily similar to the "Did you see how she was dressed? She should've
cleanhippie
Jan 2015
#16
"Charbonnier had famously shrugged off threats, saying: 'I'd rather die standing than live kneeling"
NYC_SKP
Jan 2015
#44
The quote is attibuted to Spanish republican icon Dolores Ibarruri, 3 Sept., 1936:
NYC_SKP
Jan 2015
#61
I did not know that. I thought it was original to him, but I like it either way.
cbayer
Jan 2015
#62
Religions, like all other ideas, deserve criticism, satire, and, yes, our fearless disrespect.
PassingFair
Jan 2015
#55
The claim that pro gay artists were homophobic to defend religions which are homophobic
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2015
#66
Thank you for this, I do not appreciate them but understand them more. Thanks
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#67