Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
15. Umm, he did.
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 05:38 PM
Jan 2015

He didn't just say "people" will react violently. He used an example in which HE HIMSELF would be reacting violently as part of an exoneration not to insult certain beliefs or institutions or else "you can expect a punch".

I'm sorry, but when the freaking Pope gets up and publicly declares he would react violently to certain criticisms or provocations that's sending a message to all those people he's a rather important guidance-providing authority figure to that that's ok.


"If that's what the POPE would do then hey, it has to be alright? Or at least justifiable... right?"


He may have condemned outright killing in God's name, but in the process yes he damn well did provide moral cover to those resorting to violence.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Pope Francis is wrong. Re...»Reply #15