Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Nikon

(36,925 posts)
25. Then I am at a loss to understand what you are saying
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 11:23 AM
Jan 2015

I wrote "aren't as relevant" and you write "not as relevant", but somehow those two phrases don't mean the same thing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Who am I to judge? And gays are working for the devil Major Nikon Jan 2015 #1
Well done. The contradictions are glaring at times. cbayer Jan 2015 #2
There are things I like but there are disappointments with him. hrmjustin Jan 2015 #3
Claiming gay marriage is the work of the devil is a 'disappointment'? Major Nikon Jan 2015 #4
Yes I was highly disappointed in him. hrmjustin Jan 2015 #5
The work of the devil remark is loathsome, but he said it four years ago cbayer Jan 2015 #6
He repeated virtually the same thing this past week Major Nikon Jan 2015 #7
Agree that this is not a whole lot better, but I would prefer to pin cbayer Jan 2015 #8
The only area we disagree on is the standard by which someone should be deemed morally reprehensible Major Nikon Jan 2015 #9
I'm not sure that we disagree about that standard. cbayer Jan 2015 #10
It's relevant here because I don't give the pope a pass on hate Major Nikon Jan 2015 #11
Everyone who voted for Obama in 2008 okasha Jan 2015 #12
Obama opposed Prop 8, so I don't think it's a good idea to pretend otherwise Major Nikon Jan 2015 #13
Obama played both sides of the issue okasha Jan 2015 #16
"God isn't in the mix" is the same thing as gay marriage is the work of the devil? Major Nikon Jan 2015 #17
"Choosing to associate (support) someone doesn't mean you endorse everything cbayer Jan 2015 #19
Which is a good reason why one shouldn't consider Catholics ideologicly the same as the pope Major Nikon Jan 2015 #21
The only difference between what you said about Warren and what I say about the pope cbayer Jan 2015 #23
I didn't say much of anything about Warren Major Nikon Jan 2015 #24
The point was that you can support someone without supporting everything that they say or do. cbayer Jan 2015 #26
I think you are missing a degree of separation Major Nikon Jan 2015 #27
I think you are missing my point. cbayer Jan 2015 #29
It was someone else's point to begin with Major Nikon Jan 2015 #30
That is a completely different argument and one that I did not support. cbayer Jan 2015 #31
So what's the point of bringing up Obama at all in a discussion about the pope? Major Nikon Jan 2015 #32
I didn't bring Obama up, but I think I understand the point she was trying cbayer Jan 2015 #33
I don't think you do Major Nikon Jan 2015 #34
Look, you are trying to get me to speak for someone else, which I am cbayer Jan 2015 #35
You tried to tell me what their point was, unsolicited I might add Major Nikon Jan 2015 #36
Parsing, again - dead end. cbayer Jan 2015 #37
I don't think so Major Nikon Jan 2015 #38
I don't give him a pass either, I just am able to see him in more than one dimension. cbayer Jan 2015 #18
You are distorting what I actually wrote Major Nikon Jan 2015 #20
No, it's not a fair statement. I think his words are very relevant and that he has cbayer Jan 2015 #22
Then I am at a loss to understand what you are saying Major Nikon Jan 2015 #25
You are parsing which most likely means we are at a standoff, no? cbayer Jan 2015 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author edhopper Jan 2015 #14
The Pilgrim edhopper Jan 2015 #15
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Pope Francis: A symbol of...»Reply #25