Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: ~Neil DeGrasse Tyson Shows Science And Religion Can Co-Exist In ‘Cosmos’~ [View all]NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)6. You didn't read it, did you? Here, I'll grab my highlighter.
I'm hoping that you'll get my point.
But a closer look at the segment reveals that Tyson and company may have in fact divised a far more effective way of disarming the science-v.-religion debate by venturing into what religious scholars sometimes classify as public theology. Others have rightly noted that the [div style="display:inline; background-color:#FFFF66;"]core message of the Bruno narrative isnt that God doesnt exist, but rather your God is too small.
The your here is directed not at believers at large, but instead implicitly pointed at the small minority of conservative Christians who continue to doggedly insist that science is somehow incompatible with religion.
And make no mistake, they are a minority. Although it receives less airtime than fundamentalist theological strains, scientifically-informed theology is norm not the exception among modern American Christians. For every conservative pundit or elected official who tries to use the Bible to deny climate change, polls show that there are millions more religious Americans (read: the majority of almost every faith major faith tradition) who agree that the recent string of natural disasters were the result of climate change. In fact, a recent study conducted by Rice University found that not only do roughly half of American [div style="display:inline; background-color:#FFFF66;"]evangelicals believe that science and religion can work together and support one another, but that evangelical scientists actually practice their religion more than evangelical Protestants in the general population.
My point is simple:
Enlightened evangelicals can embrace conflicting ideas openly and objectively.
Enlightened scientists do the same thing. Every day. As a matter of practice.
It's the closed minded nasty evangelicals, bad scientists, and the very unimaginative among us who hold rigid "my way or highway" points of view.
Sucks to be them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
~Neil DeGrasse Tyson Shows Science And Religion Can Co-Exist In ‘Cosmos’~ [View all]
NYC_SKP
Feb 2015
OP
Because religion purports to reveal truths about the universe that aren't true.
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#2
We are currently facing several existential crisis, and the Bullshit Factory, which includes
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2015
#10
Some of those religions are predicated upon a hoped-for future die-off.
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#14
When someone finds the middle ground between two camps, it pisses off the extremists...
NYC_SKP
Feb 2015
#7
The whales are all down here, but they should be passing through your region in a couple of months.
cbayer
Feb 2015
#13
To me, they aren't legitimate if they're stuck in their narrow POV. Good grief.
NYC_SKP
Feb 2015
#18
"Not all religions are evil Christianity, and not all Science is right." This is a nonsensical...
Humanist_Activist
Feb 2015
#19
Phenomenons are things that are happening in physical reality hence they are part of it
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#24
No we don't, that's a stupid assertion, what we don't understand now we call unknown.
Humanist_Activist
Feb 2015
#39
Both series(both Carl Sagan's and Neil Degrasse Tyson's, and their hosts and producers...
Humanist_Activist
Feb 2015
#20