Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
70. He's not talking about households. He's talking about state schools.
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 02:15 PM
Feb 2015

Helps to actually read the article/watch the video.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

People need to be protected from idealogs who wish to take pipoman Feb 2015 #1
What do you think about parents telling their children... trotsky Feb 2015 #3
They will get what they deserve....estrangement from their kids... pipoman Feb 2015 #8
That is hardly guaranteed. trotsky Feb 2015 #9
Children suffer all the time... pipoman Feb 2015 #90
Yes, which is why we do things to help. trotsky Feb 2015 #93
We are all entitled to our opinions pipoman Feb 2015 #110
So the Mormon cults where they marry young kids? Is that OK? Goblinmonger Feb 2015 #115
Every state has standards for what constitutes "abuse" few disagree with . .. pipoman Feb 2015 #175
Personally I draw the line at child abuse Lordquinton Feb 2015 #154
Some would say raising a child a vegetarian is abuse, pipoman Feb 2015 #174
Enjoy the view from your ivory tower. trotsky Feb 2015 #182
I agree that this is a very slippery slope. cbayer Feb 2015 #4
Why don't you try asking him? Try actually finding something out skepticscott Feb 2015 #6
Well, my friend, that's a bit of a straw man. longship Feb 2015 #7
Dawkins' position about children's inherent lack of belief really has no basis in fact. cbayer Feb 2015 #10
Re: balancing the rights of parents. longship Feb 2015 #17
When you say "secular education", do you then exclude all parochial schools? cbayer Feb 2015 #21
I would argue that the Jesuits do a very fine job at secular education. longship Feb 2015 #45
I agree with much of what you say. cbayer Feb 2015 #55
When you say "parochial education", are you talking about state-funded education muriel_volestrangler Feb 2015 #79
I think we use different terminology in the states. cbayer Feb 2015 #83
"Public schools are publicly funded. Private schools are not." trotsky Feb 2015 #85
I've only seen the edited video in the OP muriel_volestrangler Feb 2015 #87
I can't disagree, but I think he missed a great opportunity cbayer Feb 2015 #92
The transcript of that bit is in #20 muriel_volestrangler Feb 2015 #96
What is being proposed that would eliminate a parent's right cbayer Feb 2015 #97
The state doesn't provide denominational schools in the USA, though muriel_volestrangler Feb 2015 #98
That's good news, right? cbayer Feb 2015 #101
Dawkins' position about children's inherent lack of belief really has no basis in fact. AlbertCat Feb 2015 #161
Well, since i assume you are someone who relies on facts and reason cbayer Feb 2015 #181
No, cbayer, the issue really *is* whether children are born with a specific religion. trotsky Feb 2015 #183
In agreement here. Kids will eventually saltpoint Feb 2015 #213
Ooooo. You said 'brainwashed' !! saltpoint Feb 2015 #214
Freaked out? Hardly. cbayer Feb 2015 #215
Yeah, but you know, what you're fond of saltpoint Feb 2015 #216
You asked me why I didn't like him, and I gave you my reasons. cbayer Feb 2015 #217
He's gotten under your skin, looks like. saltpoint Feb 2015 #218
Under my skin? Screaming in the streets? cbayer Feb 2015 #219
Just can't help but notice how saltpoint Feb 2015 #221
He doesn't annoy me. I disagree with him on multiple issues cbayer Feb 2015 #222
Three articles on Dawkins in a month? saltpoint Feb 2015 #223
Yes, out of over 60. cbayer Feb 2015 #224
Didn't think you could handle it. saltpoint Feb 2015 #225
Yes, I am fully defeated, have only petty points, am very small and cbayer Feb 2015 #226
Don't turn tail, now. You posted the saltpoint Feb 2015 #228
How dare Dawkins come out against thousands of years of dogma and brainwashed minds. randys1 Feb 2015 #227
Yep. the sheer outrage of an intelligent saltpoint Feb 2015 #229
You can see it with who you are arguing with, they are uncomfortable, uncertain. randys1 Feb 2015 #230
And that makes sense in the way a humane saltpoint Feb 2015 #232
Yes, yes. I am very uncomfortable, very uncertain. cbayer Feb 2015 #233
You're the one passing judgment. saltpoint Feb 2015 #234
Dogma is another of my favorite films. cbayer Feb 2015 #231
They are born non believers phil89 Feb 2015 #60
Do you have any evidence at all to support your statement. cbayer Feb 2015 #62
Besides the entirety of human history gcomeau Feb 2015 #100
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. cbayer Feb 2015 #104
But evidence of absence is evidence of absence. gcomeau Feb 2015 #107
Not posting any more than this F4lconF16 Feb 2015 #113
I disagree very much with you and do not think it is utterly ridiculous at all. cbayer Feb 2015 #121
Well, we disagree then. F4lconF16 Feb 2015 #143
Yes, you have made it clear that you think it's preposterous. cbayer Feb 2015 #144
There is a predisposition to faith in general, but you are correct. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #146
Thanks for the link. nt F4lconF16 Feb 2015 #149
You are confusing predisposition to faith, and innate knowledge of organized faith. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #145
Yes. This thread would have gotten off saltpoint Feb 2015 #171
"kind of a sour whiff" - saltpoint, you have a way with understatement. :) trotsky Feb 2015 #180
Hi, trotsky. Yep. Dawkins has only to walk saltpoint Feb 2015 #212
Behavior and knowledge are not the same skepticscott Feb 2015 #185
BASICALLY EVERYTHING AlbertCat Feb 2015 #162
Please reacquaint yourself with the word "knowledge". gcomeau Feb 2015 #163
I know what knowledge means..... Mr Snarky AlbertCat Feb 2015 #165
Yup. That's basically my opinion, too. But Santa is a different story... ;-) nt longship Feb 2015 #65
Religious belief is of course learned...Some of these folks need to see movie randys1 Feb 2015 #126
I have Netflicks. longship Feb 2015 #131
Are you a believer or not? cbayer Feb 2015 #136
are you a moderator of this forum? or whatever you call them here? randys1 Feb 2015 #137
No. Why do you ask? cbayer Feb 2015 #138
Just so you know, this person is the self appointed leader of the self selected Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #152
I could choose to believe if certain pieces of evidence became available to me. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #147
Um, because some people manage to learn things skepticscott Feb 2015 #159
why do some raised with belief no believe and some raised without belief end up believing. AlbertCat Feb 2015 #164
You are again making assumptions with no basis in fact. cbayer Feb 2015 #184
You are again making assumptions with no basis in fact. AlbertCat Feb 2015 #190
I don't understand how my pointing out that you are making non-fact cbayer Feb 2015 #191
Nasty little zinger there at the end. saltpoint Feb 2015 #236
a propensity to belief may be a heritable trait, a specific belief is learned. Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #139
Bingo (NT) AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #148
Yes, I heard him say exactly that! PassingFair Feb 2015 #118
Oh crap, this again? We are talking about something he didnt even say? Naturally randys1 Feb 2015 #127
You could take the word of others or just decide for yourself. cbayer Feb 2015 #140
Which is quite different skepticscott Feb 2015 #160
Doubling down on the lie in the OP. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #172
That's usually something the one making the accusation does.... pipoman Feb 2015 #178
I have in post 20, and other places in this thread. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #188
parental rights AlbertCat Feb 2015 #156
Where does nosy idealog neighbor let off and a criminal act begin when speaking of "abuse"? pipoman Feb 2015 #176
Why do people have to lie about what Dawkins says? skepticscott Feb 2015 #2
It's also fun to watch those who whitewash and make excuses... trotsky Feb 2015 #31
Parents should have the right to raise their children in their faith. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #5
Unless there is evidence of actual harm, I agree completely. cbayer Feb 2015 #11
Dawkins is in love with the sound of his voice. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #12
What bothers me the most is that he has a huge missed opportunity here. cbayer Feb 2015 #13
Some of his friends should explain tactics to him. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #14
I suspect, but do not know for sure, that he doesn't take advice well. cbayer Feb 2015 #15
Unfortunately he has an inflated view of himself. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #16
OR, perhaps you are susceptible to media manipulation. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #33
I guess I am just too stupid to comprehend it. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #38
Your words, not mine. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #44
You words were clear enough. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #46
Honestly, I think you are blinded by your dislike of/outrage with Dawkins, and it doesn't AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #50
Some can say the same about you and several other podters in this room when it comes to religion. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #53
Except I'm honest enought to go verify the context and wording of the article AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #173
No, bullshit. He and Krauss together answered that question perfectly. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #23
+1 Buzz Clik Feb 2015 #34
Yeah he has the bility to turn people off. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #39
Dawkins is in love with the sound of his voice. AlbertCat Feb 2015 #166
Exactly, if you want to tell your kids they will burn in hell for eternity if they are gay.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #18
Unfortunately people spread the evil of homophobia. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #19
I know, there's anti homosexual passages even in the atheist scriptures.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #24
Well I don't pay attention to them in my scripture. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #26
There may not be passages of scripture but there are homophobes cbayer Feb 2015 #28
I did say most of us rather than all.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #30
You know, I am really going to object to this. cbayer Feb 2015 #35
I don't personally know any other members of my community Fumesucker Feb 2015 #51
? hrmjustin Feb 2015 #56
What difference does that make? cbayer Feb 2015 #58
Do you think homophobia is as common among atheists as Christians (for instance)? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #59
I can tell you that I have met homophobic atheists. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #61
My mother was an antique dealer, I grew up around gay men, they are common in the antique world Fumesucker Feb 2015 #64
My experience in general with athiests is that they are live and let live. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #66
My father was a minister. I grew up around gay men and lesbians. cbayer Feb 2015 #68
Gays who were openly gay were quite uncommon where and when I grew up.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #128
They were quite uncommonly out pretty much everywhere. cbayer Feb 2015 #135
Way to dodge the question. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #78
What was the question? hrmjustin Feb 2015 #80
Post 59. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #81
i answered him in another thread I think but to answer you I don't have any links or data to back hrmjustin Feb 2015 #82
Thank you. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #84
No, I think it's more prominent among christians. cbayer Feb 2015 #63
What aspect of their Atheism leads to having those viewpoints? Alittleliberal Feb 2015 #123
I'm not saying they are the same, except that they are both bigotry. cbayer Feb 2015 #129
Unfortunately people spread the evil of homophobia. AlbertCat Feb 2015 #167
I am well aware that religion has spread it. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #168
Don't hurt yourself scrambling after that dog whistle. Your response is bullshit and reveals AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #20
I love you too AC! hrmjustin Feb 2015 #22
Yeah, I knew you wouldn't spend the time to watch the video and find out the truth. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #25
Still love you. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #27
Wish you loved the truth instead. How you feel about me is irrelevant. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #29
I did watch it. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #36
Maybe you should watch it again. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #41
I watched it three times. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #42
So then what does your comment about parents having the right to teach their kids their AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #47
Dawkins never mentioned public schools and considering his history I don't trust him. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #48
It was part of the interviewers question. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #52
The questioner never asked about public schools but yes it coukd see how you see it that way. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #54
Yes, he did. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2015 #67
Oh yes he did. I typed it out for you upthread. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #73
I don't need your help. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #74
So, it's willful ignorance then. Ok. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #76
. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #77
I'm agnostic on my most religious days, and I find Dawkins insufferable. Buzz Clik Feb 2015 #32
I raised the question above as to what extent he may have indoctrinated cbayer Feb 2015 #40
Exactly. Buzz Clik Feb 2015 #49
He's not talking about households. He's talking about state schools. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #70
How does one indoctrinate one into not believing in invisible men in the sky? randys1 Feb 2015 #130
Listen to one of Dawkins's lectures. Buzz Clik Feb 2015 #132
Does he have one where he teaches people NOT to believe in leprechauns? randys1 Feb 2015 #134
Yeah!!! God is the same as leprechauns!! cbayer Feb 2015 #142
No, he doesn't. You're a victim of the author of this article's agenda. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #75
But the Bible is perfectly consistent with current science. No really. guillaumeb Feb 2015 #37
Well, I"ve never heard it explained in exactly that way, but cbayer Feb 2015 #43
And your endorsement of this "explanation"... trotsky Feb 2015 #202
I did not read cbayer's post as an endorsement guillaumeb Feb 2015 #238
Eve is a dick joke Lordquinton Feb 2015 #155
Just because I think you should know this. cbayer Feb 2015 #186
great graphic guillaumeb Feb 2015 #197
I really enjoyed your explanation and had never heard it before. cbayer Feb 2015 #198
do you mean guillaumeb Feb 2015 #201
Ever since I learned of this years and years ago, I have believed cbayer Feb 2015 #205
do you mean that guillaumeb Feb 2015 #196
I can't tell if this is sarcasm... MellowDem Feb 2015 #194
consider the argument another way guillaumeb Feb 2015 #200
How is the Bible "validated"... MellowDem Feb 2015 #207
my interpretation of the Adam's rib story guillaumeb Feb 2015 #208
I'm not sure... MellowDem Feb 2015 #209
the original post seems to state guillaumeb Feb 2015 #210
Science and faith are at odds... MellowDem Feb 2015 #211
Oh Jesus Christ Heddi Feb 2015 #220
do I get a t-shirt for being in the top 20? guillaumeb Feb 2015 #237
The best way to "protect" your child is to not force religious beliefs on them, and to be open to leveymg Feb 2015 #57
Agree, including being open to atheism. cbayer Feb 2015 #69
Of course, along with all other religious belief systems. leveymg Feb 2015 #71
"We can all differ in such speculation without killing each other over it." cbayer Feb 2015 #72
There is hope for humanity, after all. But, that's also an expression of faith. leveymg Feb 2015 #88
Lol! I would also add that the human imagination and capacity for love cbayer Feb 2015 #95
It's an assertion of the primacy of evidence Fumesucker Feb 2015 #86
Fact is, we just aren't smart enough to know that. leveymg Feb 2015 #89
It goes back to evidence.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #91
I like Arthur C. Clarke's vision of our recent past a lot better than the present prospect for leveymg Feb 2015 #94
"the validity of all faiths" trotsky Feb 2015 #99
All are valid to those who hold them. leveymg Feb 2015 #102
I think we are all in a position to judge merit. trotsky Feb 2015 #105
By "like-minded others" I include those willing to civilly discuss difference. leveymg Feb 2015 #108
So, what do you do with all other human beings? trotsky Feb 2015 #112
I stop trying to talk to them. leveymg Feb 2015 #116
Well that will make ISIS go away. trotsky Feb 2015 #117
The trouble with just stopping talking to them is that it cedes ground to them muriel_volestrangler Feb 2015 #179
if faith is defined as a belief system, then guillaumeb Feb 2015 #103
I'm going to mock a belief that views women as the inferior sex. trotsky Feb 2015 #106
those individual beliefs are no more a reflection of guillaumeb Feb 2015 #109
There are many people who identify with a particular faith... trotsky Feb 2015 #111
I cannot tell anyone anything. guillaumeb Feb 2015 #119
Baloney. You just did. trotsky Feb 2015 #124
Humanity has unquestionably one really effective weapon—laughter. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #151
I hate to piss on your parade... Act_of_Reparation Feb 2015 #120
So does one give up all attempt at dialogue guillaumeb Feb 2015 #125
you've admitted that faith is immune to evidence. Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #141
faith has been defined as the willing suspension of disbelief guillaumeb Feb 2015 #195
again, I've conceded that the true believers are a lost cause. Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #199
somewhat harsh, but warranted in may cases guillaumeb Feb 2015 #204
MLK didn't coddle up to white authorities and ask for a polite discussion. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2015 #153
I have been begging people to shame the bigots, racists, liars, etc. It is the only way randys1 Feb 2015 #133
I have absolute photographic, scientific proof of the birth of the FSM, and the date it occurred> leveymg Feb 2015 #114
Everyone knows that the photos of the guillaumeb Feb 2015 #122
Yes, yes. eom saltpoint Feb 2015 #158
What about explicitly teaching a specific religion in state schools? AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #150
I like spaghetti. And I love the saltpoint Feb 2015 #157
For all you well-travelled Dawkins critics that don't know what denominational school means. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #169
Dawkins. Pretty smart guy. He's right about saltpoint Feb 2015 #170
"Children need to protected from religious indoctrination in school." pokerfan Feb 2015 #177
I think we all agree, the problem is that in Ireland, there are hardly any schools cbayer Feb 2015 #187
Before you proclaim we all agree, why don't you delete or edit post 4? AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #189
I don't agree, for one Rainforestgoddess Feb 2015 #192
Allow me to clarify. cbayer Feb 2015 #193
Typical dodge. You've clarified nothing. saltpoint Feb 2015 #235
Anyone who watched... deathrind Feb 2015 #203
Yep, that's the kind of thing that one could make a case for protecting kids against. cbayer Feb 2015 #206
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Richard Dawkins: Children...»Reply #70