Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Does the individual exist? [View all]stone space
(6,498 posts)55. An eddy in the stream?
Where does the stream end and the eddy begin?
I'm reminded of the title of a Book written by Barbara Deming, "We Are All Part of One Another".
Perhaps consciousness is nothing more than a manifestation of what it "feels like" to be a universe.
But the feeling of atomic individuality and separation from the rest of the universe may very well be an illusion.
But let's take this in a less "ultimate" or "cosmological" level.
The human mind has been described by at east one evolutionary psychologist a the modular mind, analogous to a smart phone multiple independent apps.'
If this is in any way an accurate reflection of how the mind works, then it has many implications on what it means to be human, a what it means to be rational.
Robert Kurzban shows us that the key to understanding our behavioral inconsistencies lies in understanding the mind's design. The human mind consists of many specialized units designed by the process of evolution by natural selection. While these modules sometimes work together seamlessly, they don't always, resulting in impossibly contradictory beliefs, vacillations between patience and impulsiveness, violations of our supposed moral principles, and overinflated views of ourselves.
This modular, evolutionary psychological view of the mind undermines deeply held intuitions about ourselves, as well as a range of scientific theories that require a "self" with consistent beliefs and preferences. Modularity suggests that there is no "I." Instead, each of us is a contentious "we"--a collection of discrete but interacting systems whose constant conflicts shape our interactions with one another and our experience of the world.
http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9271.html
This modular, evolutionary psychological view of the mind undermines deeply held intuitions about ourselves, as well as a range of scientific theories that require a "self" with consistent beliefs and preferences. Modularity suggests that there is no "I." Instead, each of us is a contentious "we"--a collection of discrete but interacting systems whose constant conflicts shape our interactions with one another and our experience of the world.
http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9271.html
Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.)
Walt Whittman--"Song of Myself"
http://www.english.illinois.edu/maps/poets/s_z/whitman/song.htm
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.)
Walt Whittman--"Song of Myself"
http://www.english.illinois.edu/maps/poets/s_z/whitman/song.htm
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is a fishing technique that uses an array of aquatic goats to capture large
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2015
#18
As this person allegedly has most of us on ignore, how would she know?
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2015
#14
juvenile, perhaps, but the most appalling thing I've seen here in a while
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2015
#16
Most likely one of my children is transgender only to provide me an excuse to bash religion.
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2015
#39
It may be as the body is made of trillions of individual cells, we are as individual "cells" to the
Dont call me Shirley
Feb 2015
#28
it doesn't work. To a bear, everything that is not another bear is a vegetable. nt.
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2015
#48
I exist as an individual. You may not. I leave it entirely up to your preference.
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#32