Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Can Science and Mathematics coexist? [View all]stone space
(6,498 posts)25. Ok, I'll rephrase it.
(And it has been proven for 20 years now, FYI... so it does.)
Do you believe that the set theoretical assumptions that Wiles used in his proof of FMT 20 years ago are consistent?
Here's an article that discusses Wiles' set theoretical assumptions:
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9050242&fileId=S1079898600000810
If you can't access the published version, here's a pdf version of the same article that is not behind a paywall.
http://www.cwru.edu/artsci/phil/Proving_FLT.pdf
That is, do you believe in the existences of Grothendieck universes (essentially, strongly inaccessible cardinals), or at least do you believe that their existence does not lead to contradictions?
How about a whole Proper Class of Grothendieck universes?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I didn't write the proof you linked. And now you're *really* playing dumb. -eom
gcomeau
Feb 2015
#39
Math is fundamental to much of science (no pun intended). Don't see the connection w/ religion here.
pinto
Feb 2015
#24
I refuse to believe in 'imaginary numbers' until someone can proove they are real... n/t
PoliticAverse
Feb 2015
#28