Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Richard Dawkins: Children need to be ‘protected’ from religion [View all]saltpoint
(50,986 posts)212. Hi, trotsky. Yep. Dawkins has only to walk
onto a stage and begin speaking, and no matter what point he's making -- and he makes many very good ones all the time -- there's a group that just can't deal with him.
Which is why he deserves to be heard.
It would be good if young people all over the place paid him some mind instead of listening to the establishment Church folks who try to bat him down.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
238 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dawkins' position about children's inherent lack of belief really has no basis in fact.
cbayer
Feb 2015
#10
When you say "parochial education", are you talking about state-funded education
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2015
#79
The state doesn't provide denominational schools in the USA, though
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2015
#98
Dawkins' position about children's inherent lack of belief really has no basis in fact.
AlbertCat
Feb 2015
#161
No, cbayer, the issue really *is* whether children are born with a specific religion.
trotsky
Feb 2015
#183
How dare Dawkins come out against thousands of years of dogma and brainwashed minds.
randys1
Feb 2015
#227
You can see it with who you are arguing with, they are uncomfortable, uncertain.
randys1
Feb 2015
#230
I disagree very much with you and do not think it is utterly ridiculous at all.
cbayer
Feb 2015
#121
You are confusing predisposition to faith, and innate knowledge of organized faith.
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#145
Yup. That's basically my opinion, too. But Santa is a different story... ;-) nt
longship
Feb 2015
#65
Just so you know, this person is the self appointed leader of the self selected
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2015
#152
I could choose to believe if certain pieces of evidence became available to me.
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#147
why do some raised with belief no believe and some raised without belief end up believing.
AlbertCat
Feb 2015
#164
a propensity to belief may be a heritable trait, a specific belief is learned.
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2015
#139
Oh crap, this again? We are talking about something he didnt even say? Naturally
randys1
Feb 2015
#127
Where does nosy idealog neighbor let off and a criminal act begin when speaking of "abuse"?
pipoman
Feb 2015
#176
Honestly, I think you are blinded by your dislike of/outrage with Dawkins, and it doesn't
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#50
Some can say the same about you and several other podters in this room when it comes to religion.
hrmjustin
Feb 2015
#53
Except I'm honest enought to go verify the context and wording of the article
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#173
Exactly, if you want to tell your kids they will burn in hell for eternity if they are gay..
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#18
Do you think homophobia is as common among atheists as Christians (for instance)?
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#59
My mother was an antique dealer, I grew up around gay men, they are common in the antique world
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#64
i answered him in another thread I think but to answer you I don't have any links or data to back
hrmjustin
Feb 2015
#82
Don't hurt yourself scrambling after that dog whistle. Your response is bullshit and reveals
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#20
Yeah, I knew you wouldn't spend the time to watch the video and find out the truth.
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#25
So then what does your comment about parents having the right to teach their kids their
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#47
Dawkins never mentioned public schools and considering his history I don't trust him.
hrmjustin
Feb 2015
#48
The questioner never asked about public schools but yes it coukd see how you see it that way.
hrmjustin
Feb 2015
#54
No, he doesn't. You're a victim of the author of this article's agenda.
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#75
The best way to "protect" your child is to not force religious beliefs on them, and to be open to
leveymg
Feb 2015
#57
There is hope for humanity, after all. But, that's also an expression of faith.
leveymg
Feb 2015
#88
I like Arthur C. Clarke's vision of our recent past a lot better than the present prospect for
leveymg
Feb 2015
#94
By "like-minded others" I include those willing to civilly discuss difference.
leveymg
Feb 2015
#108
The trouble with just stopping talking to them is that it cedes ground to them
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2015
#179
MLK didn't coddle up to white authorities and ask for a polite discussion.
Act_of_Reparation
Feb 2015
#153
I have been begging people to shame the bigots, racists, liars, etc. It is the only way
randys1
Feb 2015
#133
I have absolute photographic, scientific proof of the birth of the FSM, and the date it occurred>
leveymg
Feb 2015
#114
For all you well-travelled Dawkins critics that don't know what denominational school means.
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#169
I think we all agree, the problem is that in Ireland, there are hardly any schools
cbayer
Feb 2015
#187
Before you proclaim we all agree, why don't you delete or edit post 4?
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#189