Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

cbayer

(146,218 posts)

46. As the thread has evolved, I have gotten a somewhat better understanding

Reply to okasha (Reply #43)

Fri Feb 27, 2015, 09:44 AM

Feb 2015

of what he was going for. I think you've pretty much got it in this post.

It's about belief without evidence.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can Science and Mathematics coexist? [View all] stone space Feb 2015 OP

Considering that math is the language of science... DetlefK Feb 2015 #1

Mistitled, a little dated Android3.14 Feb 2015 #2

In addition, I can't for the life of me figure out the connection to religion. cbayer Feb 2015 #3

Not religion per say, but some do... stone space Feb 2015 #9

We often discuss the conflict (or lack thereof) between belief cbayer Feb 2015 #10

Given point (3) in the article, ... stone space Feb 2015 #12

So you are saying that math relies on belief? cbayer Feb 2015 #13

I like the description of mathematics as... stone space Feb 2015 #14

I think it's about hostility in both directions. cbayer Feb 2015 #16

"Atheist fundamentalists think religion is trying to destroy science." trotsky Feb 2015 #19

No, Agnostics think it too. Dont call me Shirley Feb 2015 #26

I think... gcomeau Feb 2015 #20

Do you believe in Fermat's Last Theorem? (nt) stone space Feb 2015 #21

The question makes no sense. gcomeau Feb 2015 #22

Very odd that someone who skepticscott Feb 2015 #23

Ok, I'll rephrase it. stone space Feb 2015 #25

Sigh. gcomeau Feb 2015 #29

How? stone space Feb 2015 #30

The same way I can see 2+2 =4. gcomeau Feb 2015 #31

Divine revelation, perhaps? stone space Feb 2015 #32

Doing. The. Freaking. Math. gcomeau Feb 2015 #33

You are the one claiming... stone space Feb 2015 #34

I simply pointed out the proof existed. gcomeau Feb 2015 #35

That wasn't the question. stone space Feb 2015 #36

If. You. Want. To. Dispute. The. Proof. Do. The. Work. gcomeau Feb 2015 #37

How can I dispute your work? stone space Feb 2015 #38

I didn't write the proof you linked. And now you're *really* playing dumb. -eom gcomeau Feb 2015 #39

I didn't link to a proof. stone space Feb 2015 #41

Allow me to translate gcomeau's responses okasha Feb 2015 #42

Nice try, but gcomeau had it pretty well nailed in post 29 skepticscott Feb 2015 #45

I think they can coexist quite well. stone space Feb 2015 #4

It's a silly question Android3.14 Feb 2015 #5

Thus, goats. trotsky Feb 2015 #6

Congrats. You're seeing what everyone else sees, too. cleanhippie Feb 2015 #7

I feel fairly certain that you are trying to make a point here that cbayer Feb 2015 #8

My math is limited. okasha Feb 2015 #43

As the thread has evolved, I have gotten a somewhat better understanding cbayer Feb 2015 #46

You copied the title from the OP, right? stone space Feb 2015 #11

Oh, bother edhopper Feb 2015 #15

Ah, that's my childhood alter-ego. cbayer Feb 2015 #18

I'm guessing you enjoyed Anathem. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #17

Math is fundamental to much of science (no pun intended). Don't see the connection w/ religion here. pinto Feb 2015 #24

Math and Science are the inextricably bound together. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2015 #27

Somehow, I suspect that science would weather the storm. stone space Feb 2015 #44

I refuse to believe in 'imaginary numbers' until someone can proove they are real... n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2015 #28

Oh, jeezus. Iggo Feb 2015 #40