Did religion ever bring anything to mankind?

[Yorktown]

125. you use words so loosely your statements don't carry weight

The Bible and Qu'ran are works of literature.

Yes, obviously, in the sense that they are books.
But their status in society does not derive from their quality (Bible) or lack of (Quran) as pieces of literature.
Thier status derives from their claims to be the etrenal word of something called god, bestowing universal and eternal truths on us, poor human sheeple.

Claims of universal, eternal value certainly are made for Shakespeare, Sophokles, and Picasso(..)

Your parallel in the use of the words 'universal, eternal value' in both reliogious books and great authors (Shakespeare, Sophocles) lies on different layers of loose language:
1- the holy books make explicit claims of universal, eternal value, not Shakespeare
2- When critics say Shakespeare presents 'universal' values, the words universal or eternal are used in a loose way meaning that Shakespeare presents emotions that can be and will be understood by a great many people for quite a long time. Without any attempt to even pretend those values really universal and eternal.
3- futhermore, Shakespeare is demonstrably not presenting universal values: in the societies where there was polyandry, Othello makes no sense. or Othello in a couple who are swingers. In Thomas More's Utopia, Shylock would make no sense.

Anyway, universal and eternal are like infinity, they are abstractions.

Another indication that the claims of the holy books are ludicrous.