Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They are very real, but they are not the whole deal. cbayer Mar 2015 #1
Which "groups"?...I've seen mention of 1.... PassingFair Mar 2015 #4
I don't know. Why don't you contact them and ask? cbayer Mar 2015 #12
You offered: "other religious groups are pushing back." PassingFair Mar 2015 #14
The Disciples of Christ are pushing back. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #15
Yeah, that's the ONE. PassingFair Mar 2015 #16
But, have you considered Lordquinton Mar 2015 #18
That's correct, it's not all religions. cbayer Mar 2015 #21
You're in good company Lordquinton Mar 2015 #58
You are calling me a Men's Right Advocate? I would love to think you have reached the cbayer Mar 2015 #62
Obviously there's some very wonky sustance okasha Mar 2015 #69
All I know is that comparing me to a men's rights advocate made me laugh cbayer Mar 2015 #70
Churches and church leaders in Indiana were protesting this before it ever passed. cbayer Mar 2015 #19
"The majority of religious people in this country support full and equal GLBT civil rights?" Really? PassingFair Mar 2015 #22
THANK YOU. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #25
Context is everything. From the same PEW article cbayer Mar 2015 #28
What's half of 56%? beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #31
And also from the 2nd part of the article: PassingFair Mar 2015 #32
There is no question that there is a wide variation among different religious groups. cbayer Mar 2015 #34
I was talking about the people in the picture. PassingFair Mar 2015 #36
But the title indicated that you supposed people would say they are not real. cbayer Mar 2015 #37
Yes, I supposed that people would say they are not real (TM) Christians. PassingFair Mar 2015 #38
Well no one has said it at all. cbayer Mar 2015 #39
Not in THIS thread. Why? PassingFair Mar 2015 #40
A preemptive strike against the NTSF!!! beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #41
At your service! PassingFair Mar 2015 #42
Too bad "The Flying Scotsman" can't be everywhere at once! PassingFair Mar 2015 #71
DING! DING! DING! beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #72
Exactly. Kudos. cbayer Mar 2015 #45
The Episcopalians, MCC, and others. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #23
I give Episcopalians a "get out of bigotry" pass on this, hrm..... PassingFair Mar 2015 #27
I think the bishop of Indianapolis woukd have a fit if they were in a picture like that. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #29
Thanks for pointing out the ONE everyone in this thread already knew about. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #46
You're welcome. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #48
Doesn't matter. trotsky Mar 2015 #44
The Catholic church is in the signing photo. Franciscan monks and nuns. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #47
Oh, but I'm sure the wonderpope skepticscott Mar 2015 #52
therefore religion offers no moral guidance Yorktown Mar 2015 #59
Very sad! They don't represent all believers but too many. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #2
Terrible law. I hope it's roundly challenged, legally and socially. pinto Mar 2015 #3
Look at all of them, smiling like this is a good thing. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #5
Self-righteous bigots convinced they are pleasing their god. trotsky Mar 2015 #6
We should respect their religious beliefs. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #7
Anything less than Total Appeasement and AssKissing is MILITANT! Arugula Latte Mar 2015 #73
Damn uppity atheists ruin it for all the good ones. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #74
Caption the pic: "Separation of Church and State" LiberalAndProud Mar 2015 #8
Can we change that picture? pinto Mar 2015 #9
I'm just appreciating the irony. LiberalAndProud Mar 2015 #10
ALEC is way ahead of us. cbayer Mar 2015 #13
Thinking strategically, LiberalAndProud Mar 2015 #17
I like that idea. I also think we need to build coalitions. cbayer Mar 2015 #20
Sure, coalitions for common cause can be powerful. LiberalAndProud Mar 2015 #24
It did not take three organizations to back four women. cbayer Mar 2015 #30
I was right. LiberalAndProud Mar 2015 #33
Now what exactly did I say that would elicit that response? cbayer Mar 2015 #35
What, is reality too much to behold? trotsky Mar 2015 #11
Looks like your op touched a few nerves. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #26
Apparently that was the point. pinto Mar 2015 #50
You thought it was to "welcome the law" earlier. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #51
Not buying in to your internecine personal games, BMUS. Or anyone's, for that matter. pinto Mar 2015 #55
That was a mean thing to say about the op, pinto. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #56
It's good to call out hypocrisy. trotsky Mar 2015 #61
and it's even better to call out skepticscott Mar 2015 #65
Just sick of the double standard. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #67
Ah yes, proudly representing bigoted religons... MellowDem Mar 2015 #43
"Purportedly a matter of religious freedom, we find RFRA contrary to the values of our faith" stone space Mar 2015 #49
who determines what a real ANYTHING is? guillaumeb Mar 2015 #53
It wasn't a "broad brush" of anyone. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #54
my opinion is still the same guillaumeb Mar 2015 #63
It was sarcasm...you do know what that it, right? skepticscott Mar 2015 #66
Of course it is. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #68
A "real" American would be someone who is a citizen of the United States. trotsky Mar 2015 #60
Christians are self defining. Manifestor_of_Light Mar 2015 #64
Perfect!!! LostOne4Ever Mar 2015 #57
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»These must not be "r...»Reply #67