Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
18. It is duly noted
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 08:56 PM
Apr 2015

that you are dodging the question, for reasons which are obvious to those who have considered this issue in detail.

Also noted that someone with very thin skin is alert trolling....sheesh!


On Wed Apr 1, 2015, 05:13 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Sorry…another fail
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=190216

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

"Obviously you haven't thought about this in any real depth" was a gratuitous personal attack that tarnished an otherwise fine post.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Apr 1, 2015, 05:21 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: You have got to be kidding me. Stop wasting my time.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not an optimal phrasing, but not anything one shouldn't expect on just about all internet forums.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Pointless whining.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Just what does 'discussion forum' mean? Jeez, some people are such 'delicate flowers'. Get thee to a gardening or cooking forum.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Heck I am religious and didn't find this insulting. Just asking straightforward questions really. I thought it was rather politely done in fact.

Seriously? Whoever alerted on this needs to get a life.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Haven't hear from him for a long time and glad he is weighing in. cbayer Mar 2015 #1
People seeking anti-gay discrimination ping-pong between.... Htom Sirveaux Mar 2015 #2
I'm listening to a radio call in show. cbayer Mar 2015 #7
BULLSHIT. Look at this fucking photo and tell me it has nothing to do with religion. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #3
Frank Dreblin looks alive and well. TheCowsCameHome Mar 2015 #4
No kidding! Where does anyone think the bigotry comes from? skepticscott Mar 2015 #5
this is hedbo-ism all over again Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #6
I've seen at least one atheist do exactly the same in reverse. Htom Sirveaux Mar 2015 #8
I've not seen that. Perhaps you might want to link to atheist claiming that Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #9
That's not what I said the claim was. Htom Sirveaux Apr 2015 #10
Nice try, but the standard IS the same skepticscott Apr 2015 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author Htom Sirveaux Apr 2015 #12
I already laid out in the above post why there was a double standard, and what a consistent standard Htom Sirveaux Apr 2015 #13
Can I ask a simple question? Act_of_Reparation Apr 2015 #14
Warren identified double standards that put religion in a positive light Htom Sirveaux Apr 2015 #16
You may want to go back and re-read what he said. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2015 #20
True, but if he's judging religion by a standard that his opposition to religion Htom Sirveaux Apr 2015 #21
Sorry…another fail skepticscott Apr 2015 #15
How would I know? Htom Sirveaux Apr 2015 #17
It is duly noted skepticscott Apr 2015 #18
"I don't know" is not a dodge. Htom Sirveaux Apr 2015 #19
I consider the conversation between us finished. AlbertCat Apr 2015 #22
tell it to these assholes. AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #23
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Op-ed: 'Religious Discrim...»Reply #18