Religion

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)

68. Yes.

Wed Apr 1, 2015, 11:31 PM

Apr 2015

If we're talking about things like reproductive choice for women and equal rights for all under the law, I do want to impose that on others.

However, arguing a point of view and voicing arguments with ancient dogma that permeates our society and insinuates itself into our laws isn't imposing anything on anybody. If you don't care to have those conversations, it seems they're mostly easy to avoid.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Religious Freedom?? We need a new term. [View all] cbayer Mar 2015 OP

religious hatred Trillo Mar 2015 #1

I second this one! leftofcool Mar 2015 #2

Well, I was gonna say "religious bullying" rock Mar 2015 #3

"Religious bullying" is good. (nt) stone space Mar 2015 #49

I'm not a fan of lumping. Call people assholes if they are assholes, and call people MADem Mar 2015 #4

People BEHAVE edhopper Mar 2015 #5

Huh? People at the Unitarian Universalist church "believe" but they don't "hate." MADem Mar 2015 #14

Okay edhopper Mar 2015 #20

A UU might say safeinOhio Mar 2015 #23

I don't presume to speak for them but I had a cousin who was active in that church and MADem Mar 2015 #35

It's one of our 7 beliefs. safeinOhio Mar 2015 #37

Well, they came out in droves for my cousin's funeral, from all walks of life, all circumstances, MADem Mar 2015 #38

I'm just pointing out that the right once again took the language. cbayer Mar 2015 #8

Your OP didn't include that reference point--it appeared generic, so I took it that way. MADem Mar 2015 #10

I will edit to make it clearer. Thanks.. cbayer Mar 2015 #13

When "religious liberty" encompasses "hate" it's a no-go. IMO, anyway. nt MADem Mar 2015 #15

Exactly. They made it a phrase that everyone could love, cbayer Mar 2015 #16

Sounds like Luntz at work again. nt No Vested Interest Mar 2015 #36

"Words that matter" from a "turd that blathers!" nt MADem Mar 2015 #39

Right on. nt No Vested Interest Mar 2015 #45

One more: religious tyranny meow2u3 Mar 2015 #6

^This. LiberalAndProud Mar 2015 #9

That's the definition of religous tyranny to me meow2u3 Mar 2015 #12

King? High priest. LiberalAndProud Mar 2015 #21

It won't rest unless we stand up to them. cbayer Mar 2015 #22

It looks like corporate pressure will win this for us. PassingFair Apr 2015 #65

I am pleased to see the overwhelming response to this and love to cbayer Apr 2015 #66

Each side is seeking the right to impose their belief system on others. Leontius Apr 2015 #67

Yes. LiberalAndProud Apr 2015 #68

I like this one. I know we are not going to settle on a term, but I hope we cbayer Mar 2015 #11

Simply: Religion Cartoonist Mar 2015 #7

So instead of calling these bills "Religious Freedom Restoration Act", cbayer Mar 2015 #17

Religious false justification? muriel_volestrangler Mar 2015 #18

Maybe, religious false justification for hate. cbayer Mar 2015 #19

Im going with Privilege LostOne4Ever Mar 2015 #24

I like that as well because it can be applied to other areas besides these laws. cbayer Mar 2015 #25

I kind of like "religious privilege" The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2015 #26

establishing a theocracy guillaumeb Mar 2015 #27

We need to get back to the enlightenment ideals of our founders. cbayer Mar 2015 #28

but this, in my opinion, is the essential conflict guillaumeb Mar 2015 #32

I think there is a yearning for simpler, better days. cbayer Mar 2015 #34

It's hate, nothing more and nothing less. onecaliberal Mar 2015 #29

I was going with "Dogmatic Demagoguery" (it rolls off the tongue) Half-Century Man Mar 2015 #30

I like that! The Dogmatic Demagoguery Act. That says it all. cbayer Mar 2015 #31

Simplest solution, shoot the horse drag it back in. Half-Century Man Mar 2015 #44

Dominionism. okasha Mar 2015 #33

I think we need to call it Bullshit. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #40

Don't step in the Bullshit! Trillo Mar 2015 #43

Reaffirm the First Amendment Act (Reaffirm the First) pinto Mar 2015 #41

No need for a new term. The word 'superstition' already exists. Yorktown Mar 2015 #42

This is not about replacing the word religion, it's about replacing the phrase cbayer Mar 2015 #46

IMHO, superstition freedom exactly depicts 'religious freedom' Yorktown Mar 2015 #50

Are you making the case that free speech should be curtailed? cbayer Mar 2015 #51

Freedom stops when you threaten others. Simple. Yorktown Mar 2015 #52

I'm not sure you answered my question. cbayer Mar 2015 #53

Telling children that non-believers are going to hell is threatening nobody Starboard Tack Mar 2015 #54

It's still abusive and sick phil89 Mar 2015 #60

I agree. Hopefully, these children will eventually think for themselves Starboard Tack Mar 2015 #61

How should religious freedom be curtailed? hrmjustin Mar 2015 #58

I like the term that MLK used: "Religious bigotry". stone space Mar 2015 #47

That works and is a much better description than "freedom" cbayer Mar 2015 #48

Religious fuckery AZ Mike Mar 2015 #55

I chose "Religious Discrimination" at first, but that smacked of martyrdom, so I changed my vote BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #56

Religious entitlement. DetlefK Mar 2015 #57

No. Let's keep it like it is. It's perfect, just like that. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #59

Religious Exceptionalism? Maedhros Mar 2015 #62

I think they might eat that up, lol. cbayer Mar 2015 #63

Religion Misusage. nt Jamaal510 Mar 2015 #64