Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: So what exactly is Religion? [View all]TM99
(8,352 posts)43. So now I get the gish gallop.
Read that link again from Harvard. I mean seriously, fucking read it this time.
Let me highlight the parts you obviously refuse to read clearly:
In fact, some instructors may advise their students to read entries for scientific concepts on Wikipedia as a way to begin understanding those concepts.Some information on Wikipedia may well be accurate, but because experts do not review the site's entries, there is a considerable risk in relying on this source for your essays.
Got that? A way to begin to familiarize yourself with concepts but then it stops there. Why? Let's read on shall we?
The way I am using the word is meant to be objective. I am trying to not be biased for large established religions over smaller ones.
And finally, they re-iterate that it is ok to use such a source to get you started but not as a source for your further academic research.
Now back to your damned dictionary, read the first damned entry again. They are subsets of religion, but they do not define a religion in and of itself. And if you had any fucking education on this topic beyond a very basic one that can only be gleaned from a dictionary or encyclopedia, you would get this.
Here is your stated reason for using the words interchangeably --
That is an opinion based on a feeling about what is fair or not. It is not an opinion that is based on facts or a body of knowledge for a given subject. Would you seriously like all of my references for you on this topic?
This is exactly the same criticism I have made about the A&A members and the examples I gave. No religious believers are not delusional. That is an opinion based on a feeling because of that person's own past experiences. It is not based on facts or the study of psychology. That is one great example. There are plenty more.
I am not going to waste any more time in any discussions with you. I have tried to be patient. You may be entitled to an opinion, however, if it is patently wrong, there will be push back against its inaccuracies.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Covered that under "addressing the nature of reality and our response to it".
Htom Sirveaux
Mar 2015
#14
From the way it is used where I live it's meaning is completely subjective and biased
LostOne4Ever
Mar 2015
#22
Like I said, it depends on the definition, but I understand why you want to hold that position.
cbayer
Apr 2015
#42
"narcissistic inflated individuals who act as if they have 'god-like' attributes"
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2015
#35
Religion: The use of fear and superstition to maintain power and extract money
Binkie The Clown
Apr 2015
#51
I think the cult/religion division can also be about how long something has been around.
cbayer
Apr 2015
#54