Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Women's Equality in the Church is no Longer Negotiable [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)87. I did. this is how the church disburses some of the contributions it collects.
I told you I was uninterested in hacking about in the weeds about what precise word is used to label money changing hands in the church.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
155 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Because we grow weary and disgusted by your feeble apologia for the RCC.
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2015
#71
I did. this is how the church disburses some of the contributions it collects.
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2015
#87
It must, since the RCC has such deep pockets to lobby against same sex marriage and other civil righ
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2015
#93
You mean you want to stick your fingers in your ears and pretend its an improvement.
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2015
#68
I will just have to pick up the pieces of my life after your most serious accusation.
hrmjustin
Apr 2015
#23
Accusing a member of despicable behavior is different from calling that member despicable?
rug
Apr 2015
#112
The better question is why after being warned not to post in the room did you feel the need to
hrmjustin
Apr 2015
#48
Nothing. You personally were told not to post there because of your anti-religious views.
hrmjustin
Apr 2015
#38
In other words, you're banning me because of my opinions expressed elsewhere
skepticscott
Apr 2015
#47
I did not ban you. You have been hostile to believers and as host of the room I must think of the
hrmjustin
Apr 2015
#50
Same difference. Just one is without any justification, explanation, or transparency.
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2015
#85
That's cheap shit for a mod. ban people or don't. 'you were asked not to post there' is a cop out.
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2015
#77
Its the precise same representation, and YOU are thr one that tried to bend the truth
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2015
#103
You're the one that started in with claims of misrepresentation. You link it.
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2015
#106
I think I made clear that all the hosts have not responded to the head host yet.
hrmjustin
Apr 2015
#138
The person you asked to leave. You kept the poster who couldnt modulate behavior
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2015
#144
It's funny. All your pals seem to be able to navigate Urban Dictionary.
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2015
#154