Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
88. The "point" made by hunter
Fri May 15, 2015, 02:08 PM
May 2015

"will never have more than an Infinitesimal understanding of the universe. "
is not about "our understanding of the universe"?

Really Rug?

Series?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Absent a link to the actual Pew poll in the OP, bvf May 2015 #1
I'm not too surprised even if it's true though. trotsky May 2015 #2
True. bvf May 2015 #3
That can't happen unless one of them is a Catholic, nominal or not. rug May 2015 #14
Her fiancé is nominally catholic, bvf May 2015 #16
Hypocrisy aside, no. rug May 2015 #17
Yeah, I'll get right on that. bvf May 2015 #18
All snark aside, I hope they have a memorable wedding and a happy life together. rug May 2015 #20
I never imagined I'd be saying this, bvf May 2015 #21
My fiancee and I were both raised Catholic, and thought about doing this as well... Humanist_Activist May 2015 #83
It wouldn't surprise me, either. Act_of_Reparation May 2015 #22
Considerable resolve indeed. trotsky May 2015 #23
If humans are hard wired for belief, guillaumeb May 2015 #36
Here you go: trotsky May 2015 #65
Thank you. guillaumeb May 2015 #105
Looking at the actual report edhopper May 2015 #4
Agree. This is the same complaint I had with an article posted yesterday. cbayer May 2015 #7
You are correct. Promethean May 2015 #25
Actually, I think the article points out exactly the opposite of what you are saying. cbayer May 2015 #26
You know the best part about skeptics? Promethean May 2015 #42
You know the very best thing about believers? cbayer May 2015 #45
Really? Promethean May 2015 #48
Dang, nice post. +1 nt F4lconF16 May 2015 #55
Dang, he was able to get all those ad homs in and you didn't have to! cbayer May 2015 #64
I guess someone hit a nerve, eh cbayer? trotsky May 2015 #68
"Ah, the calling someone's point a fallacy fallacy." Act_of_Reparation May 2015 #69
The jokes write themselves, folks! trotsky May 2015 #70
Not remotely comparable. cbayer May 2015 #72
Your responses remind me of a common meme... cleanhippie May 2015 #74
LOL trotsky May 2015 #75
Yes, it is different. Act_of_Reparation May 2015 #79
Bingo. n/t trotsky May 2015 #82
Oh noes! Promethean May 2015 #92
Careful, pointing out her hypocrisy will get you ignored... beam me up scottie May 2015 #93
That post is just so CBAYER. trotsky May 2015 #94
Hey she helps keep thousands of irony meter manufacturing employees employed. beam me up scottie May 2015 #95
That thread was a gift that kept on giving! trotsky May 2015 #97
Ikr? beam me up scottie May 2015 #99
"Agenda". Act_of_Reparation May 2015 #98
Are you calling me a RWer? cbayer May 2015 #96
Not cool? Like accusing 1st Amendment supporters of "cheering" for Geller?: beam me up scottie May 2015 #100
+1,000,000 beam me up scottie May 2015 #56
Oh dear, full of ad homs. cbayer May 2015 #62
Beautiful. trotsky May 2015 #67
Like atheists and agnostics don't? xfundy May 2015 #57
Of course atheists and agnostics do. That was the point of the post. cbayer May 2015 #63
I see religion largely as a language. hunter May 2015 #5
The biggest difference though, is that... trotsky May 2015 #6
That's another flavor of literalism. hunter May 2015 #10
I think the temptation to simply dismiss wrong-headed religion as "literalism"... trotsky May 2015 #11
I like your ""Just the fact's Ma'am" approach to life" image. Yorktown May 2015 #43
size has no relationship to understanding. Warren Stupidity May 2015 #60
But it is limited to the size, and functional limits, of the brain. rug May 2015 #73
Yes. So what? Warren Stupidity May 2015 #76
The so what is we live within many limits. rug May 2015 #77
what does that have to do with our understanding of the universe? Warren Stupidity May 2015 #85
I'm glad you don't disagree with my statement. rug May 2015 #87
The "point" made by hunter Warren Stupidity May 2015 #88
Really, Warren. Read his post without omitting words. rug May 2015 #89
you got nothing. Warren Stupidity May 2015 #102
"you got nothing." rug May 2015 #103
Radiation is invisible, as is gravity. guillaumeb May 2015 #28
As usual, if you want to claim a "god" that does not interact with the universe other Warren Stupidity May 2015 #61
So are leprechauns and unicorns. trotsky May 2015 #66
Unicorns cannot be undetectable. guillaumeb May 2015 #106
Wrong. AtheistCrusader May 2015 #71
If radiation were invisible skepticscott May 2015 #80
Radiation is not always invisible Fumesucker May 2015 #90
Shhh, you're going to totally ruin his "Checkmate, atheists!" moment of triumph. trotsky May 2015 #91
Why do creationists believe the existence of other invisible things = a creator? beam me up scottie May 2015 #101
I'm seeing a lot more about "cultural" christians, particularly cultural catholics. cbayer May 2015 #8
Oh I don't think anyone has a problem distinguishing between "good" and "evil" uses of religion. trotsky May 2015 #9
If you can't define good and evil, you'll have a hard time distinguishing between them. rug May 2015 #15
One of the uses of religion Mariana May 2015 #84
It's also one of the functions of civil law. rug May 2015 #86
Flying two hijacked airliners into buildings bvf May 2015 #12
Exactly. trotsky May 2015 #19
"Dropping two nuclear devoces on Japanese cities on order to kill hundreds guillaumeb May 2015 #27
"Some people claiming to be acting from religious motives did" beam me up scottie May 2015 #29
We should believe that they are possibly being truthful as to motivation, guillaumeb May 2015 #31
All religious people believe that "their interpretation" of their religion is correct. beam me up scottie May 2015 #33
People generally believe that their perceptions are correct. guillaumeb May 2015 #35
Iow, no one actually condemned all muslims. beam me up scottie May 2015 #37
No one specifically condemned "ALL Muslims" guillaumeb May 2015 #39
bvf was referencing a common apologist meme. beam me up scottie May 2015 #40
So you broad brush me as an attempt to rebut the evidence I produced guillaumeb May 2015 #46
What evidence? beam me up scottie May 2015 #47
you asked about atheists who broad brush, I provided a link, guillaumeb May 2015 #49
Where was the broad brush? beam me up scottie May 2015 #50
Where was the broad brush? guillaumeb May 2015 #51
You said you had evidence of broad brush bigotry and have yet to produce it. beam me up scottie May 2015 #52
Already produced. Can actually be read in this conversation. eom guillaumeb May 2015 #53
Where? beam me up scottie May 2015 #54
Do you doubt for a fucking moment bvf May 2015 #30
define heathenism in this context. guillaumeb May 2015 #32
And how, exactly? bvf May 2015 #34
heathen meaning non-western? guillaumeb May 2015 #38
No, "heathen" being non-christian. bvf May 2015 #41
Wow. That was one tortured analogy. Warren Stupidity May 2015 #58
Torture is also a war crime. eom guillaumeb May 2015 #104
Very insightful comment, Hunter. Thanks for sharing. nt No Vested Interest May 2015 #13
The headline is, unsurprisingly, wrong. gcomeau May 2015 #24
True: the title of the article is false. Plain wrong. Yorktown May 2015 #44
No. shenmue May 2015 #78
What? -eom gcomeau May 2015 #81
Post removed Post removed May 2015 #59
Nones.. MellowDem May 2015 #107
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Half of Atheist Kids Wind...»Reply #88