Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
Sat May 16, 2015, 09:48 PM May 2015

An interesting comment... (edit) [View all]

Last edited Sun May 17, 2015, 02:53 AM - Edit history (1)

A tweet which appeared on a debate between Dawkins and Pell:

"Religion shouldn't be taken literally. It's guidance... This is what creates conflict."

I found this to be a very interesting idea. I actually like it. I would have no problem with religion were it to be made explicitly clear that it is used as guidance. There is much to learn from the myths that have arisen throughout history, including the major faiths still practiced today.


On edit...

I've thought about this and reconsidered. This should be clarified.

Religion in itself is not a useful tool. The practice of religion has some positive effects--all of which can be gained by secular methods, and arguably to greater extent--with not just considerable harmful effects, but often highly dangerous ones (ranging from extreme and militant fundamentalists to widespread phenomena like what is happening to our school districts). I do not agree with the practice of religion.

Anyways, as to what I said:
"Religion shouldn't be taken literally. It's guidance... This is what creates conflict."

I found this to be a very interesting idea. I actually like it. I would have no problem with religion were it to be made explicitly clear that it is used as guidance.

This is really a case of something sounding nice, and me not thinking about it. I would still have a problem with religion for all the reasons I am currently an atheist. All of the absolutely terrible moral guidance of religion doesn't just disappear because the practice is not literal. As if that would ever be possible.

I do, however believe that a close study of the various religions throughout the world and and history as well as strong education in the physical sciences can be helpful for our communities to better understand their own religions and others. And yes, I do believe that this will result in more people becoming atheists. If balanced, honest education about the different cultures and people around the world causes it, I'm all for it. This is not forcing an "atheistic" viewpoint on anyone any more than teaching evolution in public schools is.

Anyways, yeah. I was wrong, and that was stupid.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An interesting comment... (edit) [View all] F4lconF16 May 2015 OP
Problem is, most religions purport to be revealed truth. AtheistCrusader May 2015 #1
Until the rise of political Christian Fundamentalism TM99 May 2015 #2
Utter balderdash skepticscott May 2015 #4
literal atheism? edhopper May 2015 #6
Pell had egg on his face in that debate Yorktown May 2015 #3
Then go all the way Cartoonist May 2015 #5
Here's the transcript and video. rug May 2015 #7
Guidance towards what? And what would be the results? Humanist_Activist May 2015 #8
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»An interesting comment......»Reply #0