An article worth reading

[rug]

43. I disagree with yo on 6, 9, and 10.

As to 6, the demand for material, demonstrable evidence is the heart of the argument. By definition a god is super-natural, beyond the usual, natural metrics and tests. The challenge is really to the notion of such an entity, not its footprints. The challenge is philosophical. So, I disagree with the level of importance you give it.

As to 9, the portrayal of religion on the internet is sally a strawman. Understandably so, because it is then easier to push over. I really would like to see a discussion about a god or gods that does not start with a caricature.

As to 10, "Its the internet dude, get over it" hardly covers the assholery that goes on all over the internet, including here, whenever the subject of religion comes up. The internet is too powerful and valuable a resource to leave to high-fiving assholes, religious or atheist.

I think he and you have some very solid observations,