Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
104. Not only do you not understand the concept of God, you don't understand what philosophy is.
Tue May 26, 2015, 10:58 AM
May 2015

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

#winning AtheistCrusader May 2015 #1
I'm praying these trends continue. nt. Warren Stupidity May 2015 #2
this ---> Binkie The Clown May 2015 #3
Agreed, these are all very positive trends! trotsky May 2015 #5
You left out the important part, trotsky. rug May 2015 #4
If I may say. .. Trajan May 2015 #52
I will only say two things. 1) With superstition comes many cultural values. rug May 2015 #53
You're right ... Trajan May 2015 #58
Human sacrifice was conducted on pyramids built with great skill and geometric knowledge. rug May 2015 #68
Religion matches the definition of superstition Yorktown May 2015 #74
The key word that emphasizes the difference is "irrational". rug May 2015 #75
Show me belief in Jeezus or muhamad is rational. Yorktown May 2015 #85
Show me it's irrational. it's your claim. rug May 2015 #86
it's irrational to believe in something that can not be shown or demonstrated Yorktown May 2015 #87
That's simply the hoary material evidence for the immaterial argument. rug May 2015 #88
You would have to show why to believe in anything 'immaterial' Yorktown May 2015 #89
You completely miss the point. rug May 2015 #90
Who says god is immaterial? Yorktown May 2015 #91
As soon as you tell me who us is. rug May 2015 #92
As if you did not know. Yorktown May 2015 #93
Ditto. rug May 2015 #94
Still waiting for you to explain your sentences Yorktown May 2015 #95
Note the material attributes of YHWH. rug May 2015 #96
You are not an exam jury. Answer my questions first, I'll answer yours. Yorktown May 2015 #97
Lol, we're not playing doctor. I'll show mine in due course. rug May 2015 #98
I already asked you, how do you know 'god' has no physical attributes? Yorktown May 2015 #99
Because one with attribute has limitations and therefore is neither infinite nor supernatural. rug May 2015 #100
Philosophy was an umbrella word which lost many branches over time Yorktown May 2015 #102
Not only do you not understand the concept of God, you don't understand what philosophy is. rug May 2015 #104
LOL explain both then. Yorktown May 2015 #105
I suggest you start reading first. rug May 2015 #106
Dontcha you no worry 'bout me reedin' Yorktown May 2015 #107
Subreddits don't count. rug May 2015 #108
Damn. A shame, really. Yorktown May 2015 #109
Superstition and religion are synonymous. nt Arugula Latte May 2015 #101
Yup. Unless someone can come up with a demonstrable difference. Yorktown May 2015 #103
"slightly" PoutrageFatigue May 2015 #6
Uh oh. trotsky May 2015 #7
Are you more interested in the elimination of Catholicism than in political influence? rug May 2015 #8
4 in 10 = slightly PoutrageFatigue May 2015 #9
You should post the source of that stat because it really doesn't match the chart. rug May 2015 #12
" (smiley omitted, because I'm not twelve.)" - interesting. Warren Stupidity May 2015 #15
The source is the Pew poll muriel_volestrangler May 2015 #16
It's also the source for a six percent decline. rug May 2015 #17
Why do you say a 6% decline? Jim__ May 2015 #33
I don't see this in the poll edhopper May 2015 #34
The OP article talks about it a little bit. Jim__ May 2015 #35
Is my math off? rug May 2015 #38
No. Did you see the ETA at the end of my post? Jim__ May 2015 #48
Thanks. rug May 2015 #49
But you continually phil89 May 2015 #57
If you mean my reflexive knee jerks have declined, unlike yours, yes, then that is mature. rug May 2015 #69
I see no reason to believe you are not twelve. Warren Stupidity May 2015 #11
Then you should brush up on reason. rug May 2015 #13
why? Warren Stupidity May 2015 #14
You're not Socrates either. rug May 2015 #18
Well you accidentally got something right. Warren Stupidity May 2015 #22
Better than yor usual deliberately getting things wrong. rug May 2015 #23
you really are. Lordquinton May 2015 #36
Are what, quinton? rug May 2015 #37
oh rug, you know. nt Lordquinton May 2015 #43
No, I don't know what thoughts inhabit your skull. Do tell. rug May 2015 #46
I am proud to say Cartoonist May 2015 #10
What force was used? rug May 2015 #19
never being given a choice Cartoonist May 2015 #20
What other choices did you lose at age seven? rug May 2015 #21
A lot of minor stuff Cartoonist May 2015 #24
i think you lost your minor stuff when you turned 18 Lordquinton May 2015 #55
Minimize, deflect, dismiss. Classic rug. Anything for the church. AtheistCrusader May 2015 #25
Oh get over yourself. rug May 2015 #27
Wait a minute... NeoGreen May 2015 #31
No, because evidence is applicable only to things that can be seen, measured or sensually perceived. rug May 2015 #39
Ask the thousands of children raped by catholic priests about truebrit71 May 2015 #28
Be my guest to approach rape victims to support your anti-religious agenda. rug May 2015 #40
Interesting that your pro-catholic church agenda is to continue... truebrit71 May 2015 #41
Not nearly as telling as using rape as a prop. rug May 2015 #42
Or you continuing to deflect... truebrit71 May 2015 #44
The post was about Communion. You took it upon yourself to inject rape. rug May 2015 #45
No, the post was in response to your question "Which other choices did you lose at age seven?' truebrit71 May 2015 #47
Naturally, rape was one of the choices in your mind. rug May 2015 #50
Naturally, afterall, we were talking about the catholic church... truebrit71 May 2015 #51
Next time I mention the Cathedral of Notre Dame, rug May 2015 #56
And the apologist with nothing but continued deflections... truebrit71 May 2015 #61
The only deflection in this thread is coming from your keyboard. rug May 2015 #67
..... he said as he deflected again.... truebrit71 May 2015 #71
Good news indeed, when repressive rightwing institutions start to show major cracks. Arugula Latte May 2015 #26
Who proofreads this stuff? Flying Squirrel May 2015 #29
Spellcheck is good enough,right? trotsky May 2015 #30
Going through motions to please older generation HockeyMom May 2015 #32
I missed the part about "why" this is great news for the country. guillaumeb May 2015 #54
Because it means the influence of the church (i.e., its leaders) will wane. trotsky May 2015 #59
The influence of the institutional church may wane, guillaumeb May 2015 #60
So, without religion, we turn communist? Humanist_Activist May 2015 #62
I said nothing of the sort. guillaumeb May 2015 #63
I'm sorry, I find tact wasted on those who specialize in dishonest rhetoric and argument. Humanist_Activist May 2015 #64
Let us use all 4 as examples guillaumeb May 2015 #65
But non-believers don't point to atheism as a moral system, religious believers do do so... Humanist_Activist May 2015 #66
And I must agree with you guillaumeb May 2015 #70
I will argue that the Catholic Church's loss of influence is a positive thing, case in point... Humanist_Activist May 2015 #72
That vote was amazing. guillaumeb May 2015 #73
Hell yeah. That was a HUGE "fuck off" to the RCC. Arugula Latte May 2015 #76
How many active Catholics do you figure voted to legalize? rug May 2015 #78
Plenty, in fact, I would say the majority, and that's the point, the Church is losing its.... Humanist_Activist May 2015 #79
If they're active, the institution is fine. rug May 2015 #81
Oh, probably a lot. And they realize they don't need to take the dogma seriously Arugula Latte May 2015 #80
Do you think active Catholics who voted to legalize are complicit in homophobic bigotry? rug May 2015 #82
I'm talking about the Grand Poohbahs -- WonderPope, bishops, cardinals, priests -- Arugula Latte May 2015 #83
And the answer to the qestion is . . . . ? rug May 2015 #84
From my personal experience... malokvale77 May 2015 #77
How many former Catholics have become evangelicals? Gloria May 2015 #110
Quite a few, from what I've heard. trotsky May 2015 #111
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»The Catholic Church’s Ame...»Reply #104