Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Lawmakers that deliberately pass obviously unconstitutional laws need to face a consequence. Fred Sanders Jun 2015 #1
The GOP replaced Christianity as a religion a long time ago. xfundy Jun 2015 #3
That is not "Christianity" the GOP is pushing, that is classic fascism...we who know, know it. Fred Sanders Jun 2015 #15
Funny, that's pretty much the same thing right-wingers say about liberal believers. trotsky Jun 2015 #18
At first I thought you were talking about the Hunky Jesus contest in SF xfundy Jun 2015 #2
A piece I came across on the contest led me to post. (aside) I like the sunglasses and the event. pinto Jun 2015 #5
You would think Christians would know what their main man looked like...and not to mention Fred Sanders Jun 2015 #16
It has been this way for some time. potone Jun 2015 #4
Easy to do bvf Jun 2015 #6
Under Reagen real power TM99 Jun 2015 #7
The religious right began wedding religion and politics. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2015 #17
It's always been wedded. Igel Jun 2015 #19
They find one little bitty safeinOhio Jun 2015 #8
"a visceral, aggressive, in your face version" trotsky Jun 2015 #9
Republican Jesus? mr blur Jun 2015 #10
The christian right co-opted and redefined christianity to the point that many cbayer Jun 2015 #11
Oh, bullshit. The right didn't "redefine" Christianity. trotsky Jun 2015 #12
"Redefined Christianity". Yeah, that's what they did. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2015 #13
You DO know who the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence are....right? AlbertCat Jun 2015 #21
I DO and I LOVE them! Why? cbayer Jun 2015 #23
They are a lasting take away from my first visit to SF Pride. Along with the "dykes on bikes" lead. pinto Jun 2015 #29
Somewhere along the way: 28 October 312. Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #14
Thanks for the link. I'm aware of the history. My OP was framed in my own personal experiences. pinto Jun 2015 #28
The point is that the NT is not being held hostage by the right Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #30
I think the angry warrior god persona of the OT and the Jesus persona of the NT are different. pinto Jun 2015 #31
You are certainly entitled to your opinion. trotsky Jun 2015 #32
I tried to point out to you that the warrior god jesus persona dates to at least 312. Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #33
Choosing to see things as they are, instead of how one PREFERS them to be... trotsky Jun 2015 #34
Good points. Got them, you didn't fail. I think the Jesus story has been repeatedly co-opted. pinto Jun 2015 #35
tenants advocated by the historical Jesus. AlbertCat Jun 2015 #20
Did Jesus fight slumlords? cbayer Jun 2015 #22
Why do you make fun of people's typos... trotsky Jun 2015 #24
Doesn't bother me. AlbertCat Jun 2015 #25
That's good to know. trotsky Jun 2015 #26
I don't see much to gain by pointing them out. AlbertCat Jun 2015 #27
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Hunky Jesus - The message...»Reply #23