Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Is it ethically compromised to financially support a religious institution that promotes bigotry? [View all]TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)7. You know perfectly well that there are no straightforward...
and simple questions in this forum.
There are leading questions, trolling questions, trick questions, and many others.
But not simple ones.
So, since there is such an obvious answer, what is the point in asking?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Is it ethically compromised to financially support a religious institution that promotes bigotry? [View all]
Warren Stupidity
Aug 2015
OP
Who is "it"? And supporting the recipient of the money knowing of the bigotry, or not?
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#1
So you do not see an ethical problem with supporting an institution that you admit promotes bigotry?
Warren Stupidity
Aug 2015
#36
So when you said up above "It does, in some of its political activities"
Warren Stupidity
Aug 2015
#40
Not at all. Your inept poll question refers to "religious institutions", not all its activities.
rug
Aug 2015
#43
It must be comforting to you to be able to ignore the hideous activities of your church.
Warren Stupidity
Aug 2015
#47
I don't see any reason to bring it up until there are more revelations about corruption, cronyism,
AtheistCrusader
Aug 2015
#58
If Rug doesn't like it, post = trolling. Please recalibrate your equipment accordingly.
AtheistCrusader
Aug 2015
#20
I try to discern if the poster is genuinely concerned about a problem, or attempting to poke bears.
AtheistCrusader
Aug 2015
#26
And what dictates your decision to say "Fuck you" to a poster, as you did yesterday?
rug
Aug 2015
#30
Ambivalent hand-waving and dismissiveness on a serious issue that hurts people worldwide.
AtheistCrusader
Aug 2015
#32
probably the same motivation that sends some posters here on extended time-outs.
Warren Stupidity
Aug 2015
#37
Oh, no, that is the result of the dishonest "alert trolling" you're always whining about.
rug
Aug 2015
#39
Given your complaints about alert trolling, your disingenuosness is particularly cloying.
rug
Aug 2015
#51
If you are making a sweeping accusation of groups that may include millions of people
Agnosticsherbet
Aug 2015
#64
It's funny how so many think that giving money to the KKK ain't the same as giving to the RCC.
cleanhippie
Aug 2015
#75
Because ethics is a field of study with a strong dialectic tradition.
Act_of_Reparation
Aug 2015
#79
Let me guess, religion is special and their special kind of bigotry isn't really bigotry?
beam me up scottie
Aug 2015
#78