Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: When science and religion are compatable. [View all]Silent3
(15,909 posts)48. While atheism is quite often a consequence...
...of a scientific world view, atheism itself is just a lack of belief in god, full stop.
You can arrive at atheism via multiple paths, and don't necessarily have to leave behind irrational or superstitious thinking. I suspect that some atheists are atheists for purely emotional reasons -- perhaps rebellion against strict religious parents, perhaps bad things have happened in their lives that make them leaps to a bitterness-fueled conclusion that no god can exist if these terrible things can happen, etc.
That said, all the atheists I personally know are the skeptically and scientifically-minded sort, and to the extent that there's an "atheist movement", skepticism and science are central to that movement.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, the cartoon strip is called "Jesus and Mo", which is a bit of a giveaway.
mr blur
Apr 2012
#10
You do realize that science, at its core, has nothing to do with atheism, at its core, don't you?
rug
Apr 2012
#8
Still avoiding and insulting. I'll stand by my statement. If, in fact, many atheists
humblebum
Apr 2012
#24
I also made a counter-point to the assertion that I thought you were getting at.
eqfan592
Apr 2012
#33
There is NOTHING more broad-focused (NOT "narrowly-focused") than scientific and free-thinking
SamG
Apr 2012
#35
The modern Scientific Method itself is based on the epistemology of Logical Positivism, which
humblebum
Apr 2012
#36
No more asinine than the assertions that triggered the response the last million times, but
humblebum
Apr 2012
#38