Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
40. It is for now, with A/A's being less than 15 percent of the populace
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 03:42 PM
Sep 2015

Bet you even money it correlates with people who have become atheists, having departed some religion with dogma around this issue, like the RCC.

I've noted people don't instantly change every element of their worldview the moment they leave religion.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Dammit. What is "moral" about putting a girl's or woman's life in jeopardy? elfin Aug 2015 #1
The judge was appointed by Dubya on September 10, 2011. rug Aug 2015 #2
I believe you meant to type 2001, rather than 2011. No Vested Interest Sep 2015 #32
Mea culps. Fixed. rug Sep 2015 #33
What does the morality of an employer..... AlbertCat Sep 2015 #31
what about viagara? what if someone DesertFlower Aug 2015 #3
In theory, this judge should bar that as well. rug Aug 2015 #4
well cialis is basically the same. DesertFlower Aug 2015 #5
Could be, his prose is wooden. rug Aug 2015 #6
Nice smokescreen you found there. AtheistCrusader Aug 2015 #7
Like it or not, atheism is not all rainbows, progress and paradise. rug Aug 2015 #8
I did a little googling of my own. Less than 12% of atheists and agnostics are anti abortion. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #10
12? 1 out of 8? That's higher than I thought. rug Sep 2015 #34
It is for now, with A/A's being less than 15 percent of the populace AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #40
I especially like that last link you found, looks like a dead geocities page from the 90's AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #11
Second link from the bottom, 10 comments, 80% religious. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #12
Third link from the bottom, Kate Goodwin could only cite herself as a non-religious AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #13
Fourth link from the bottom, 7,000 followers or less, worldwide. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #14
Fifth link from the bottom, less than 2k followers, can only cite a source AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #15
Sixth link from the bottom was a pro life white male catholic before he became an atheist. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #16
7th from the bottom, ANOTHER president of pro-life Atheists? Either you're double dipping or AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #17
8th link from the bottom is the same asshole as link 7, and 4, or 5, I forget. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #18
Ninth link from the bottom is just another duplicate to the blog roll of a site you already linked. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #19
And the first link won't load, but I see you're triple-dipping again. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #20
BRILLIANT!!! You so totally rock, dude! beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #22
the technique is wrong anyway. The correct way to do a google gish gallop is to separate each Warren Stupidity Sep 2015 #23
0.32 seconds is all I chose to devote to it. rug Sep 2015 #35
Wrong. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #41
!2% is 12%. Put any adjective on it you want. rug Sep 2015 #42
In contrast to Catholics, 'statistical noise'. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #44
But it does tarnish the crisader symblo on your tunic. rug Sep 2015 #45
Probably refugees from churches like yours. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #47
sorry, i don't deal in suppositions. rug Sep 2015 #49
Doesn't seem to be a lot of data. Julia Gillard, former Aussie PM is atheist and was AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #56
If I find one I will. rug Sep 2015 #59
It would be worthy of an Op. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #61
Damn! Superb takedown. Lordquinton Sep 2015 #21
One of eight atheists is not 20 churches with 50 members. rug Sep 2015 #36
Look at you, so desperate to mis-frame these demographics. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #43
Oh get over yourself. rug Sep 2015 #46
Pew didn't ask the question, but I have yet to meet one that was always an atheist. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #48
Hmm, don't you preach we are all born atheist? rug Sep 2015 #50
We are. Then people begin programming us with doctrine AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #52
In that case, compared to the then extant DSM. rug Sep 2015 #53
Impossible. It was removed from the DSM 5 years before I was born. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #57
Do you know when the Catechism was written? rug Sep 2015 #58
Within a year. Problem is, Persona Humana is still in force, is it not? AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #60
I did some checking. The process of writing the new catechism was begn in 1985. rug Sep 2015 #62
Did you forget something? AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #66
Let me check. rug Sep 2015 #67
Allow me. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #69
1. No one said a thing about secularists. rug Sep 2015 #70
You said compared, not based on in post 53. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #71
Is that it? Seriously? rug Sep 2015 #72
Comparison is similar. So what. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #73
To the entirety of your posts in this subthread, I say so what. rug Sep 2015 #74
That's lovely. DSM is fixed. When is your church going to drop the raging homophobia? AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #75
See #74. rug Sep 2015 #76
Let me know when you're done with recursive loops and want to answer the question. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #77
As soon as you're done quibbling with idioms. rug Sep 2015 #78
If you're going to dismiss that as quibbling, we're done. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #79
That's what it always comes down to, doesn't it? cleanhippie Sep 2015 #80
Speaking of "superfluous nonsense", weigh in. "Compared to" or "in contrast to"? rug Sep 2015 #82
You were getting at something while playing coy. I tried to interpret. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #83
And you ignored the question Lordquinton Sep 2015 #63
And you will never get over yourself. rug Sep 2015 #64
Holy non sequitors batman! Lordquinton Sep 2015 #65
Do you often opine, thinking of what others will think of you? rug Sep 2015 #68
do you often dodge questions? nt Lordquinton Sep 2015 #86
I believe you just did. rug Sep 2015 #87
So that's a yes? nt Lordquinton Sep 2015 #88
Yes, you did. rug Sep 2015 #89
I did point out that you're still not answering the question Lordquinton Sep 2015 #90
Where's urbscotty with one of those wrongly worded memes when you need one? cleanhippie Sep 2015 #81
He keeps trying he might accidentally get one right. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #85
I understand you fervently believe religion represents all that is right and rational in humanity. Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #92
Your understanding is flawed. rug Sep 2015 #93
no more than yours Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #94
Wow, dude! That's like an epic Hitchslap, delivered with no mercy whatsoever. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #28
"Oh!" rug Sep 2015 #37
Here is your award for administering such an epic beatdown. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #29
In your dreams. rug Sep 2015 #38
If people don't believe in contraception, they don't have to use it.q SheilaT Aug 2015 #9
The GOP and the RCC edhopper Sep 2015 #24
Can anyone think of the "science and moral convictions" they claim to believe muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #25
WTF???? Faux pas Sep 2015 #26
Does the company have to prove that moral stance or can they claim anything willy-nilly? DetlefK Sep 2015 #27
IIRC, Hobby Lobby won based on RFRA. Jim__ Sep 2015 #30
He's basing it on the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifthe Amemdment, rug Sep 2015 #39
Every sperm is sacred HassleCat Sep 2015 #51
PLEASE let there be an animal-rights activist employer Freddie Sep 2015 #54
That is an excellent example. rug Sep 2015 #55
SHARIA!!! pansypoo53219 Sep 2015 #84
Using hormonal birth control results in fewer dead zygotes than no birth control muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #91
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Judge Allows Moral, Not J...»Reply #40