Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Dammit. What is "moral" about putting a girl's or woman's life in jeopardy? elfin Aug 2015 #1
The judge was appointed by Dubya on September 10, 2011. rug Aug 2015 #2
I believe you meant to type 2001, rather than 2011. No Vested Interest Sep 2015 #32
Mea culps. Fixed. rug Sep 2015 #33
What does the morality of an employer..... AlbertCat Sep 2015 #31
what about viagara? what if someone DesertFlower Aug 2015 #3
In theory, this judge should bar that as well. rug Aug 2015 #4
well cialis is basically the same. DesertFlower Aug 2015 #5
Could be, his prose is wooden. rug Aug 2015 #6
Nice smokescreen you found there. AtheistCrusader Aug 2015 #7
Like it or not, atheism is not all rainbows, progress and paradise. rug Aug 2015 #8
I did a little googling of my own. Less than 12% of atheists and agnostics are anti abortion. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #10
12? 1 out of 8? That's higher than I thought. rug Sep 2015 #34
It is for now, with A/A's being less than 15 percent of the populace AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #40
I especially like that last link you found, looks like a dead geocities page from the 90's AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #11
Second link from the bottom, 10 comments, 80% religious. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #12
Third link from the bottom, Kate Goodwin could only cite herself as a non-religious AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #13
Fourth link from the bottom, 7,000 followers or less, worldwide. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #14
Fifth link from the bottom, less than 2k followers, can only cite a source AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #15
Sixth link from the bottom was a pro life white male catholic before he became an atheist. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #16
7th from the bottom, ANOTHER president of pro-life Atheists? Either you're double dipping or AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #17
8th link from the bottom is the same asshole as link 7, and 4, or 5, I forget. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #18
Ninth link from the bottom is just another duplicate to the blog roll of a site you already linked. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #19
And the first link won't load, but I see you're triple-dipping again. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #20
BRILLIANT!!! You so totally rock, dude! beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #22
the technique is wrong anyway. The correct way to do a google gish gallop is to separate each Warren Stupidity Sep 2015 #23
0.32 seconds is all I chose to devote to it. rug Sep 2015 #35
Wrong. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #41
!2% is 12%. Put any adjective on it you want. rug Sep 2015 #42
In contrast to Catholics, 'statistical noise'. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #44
But it does tarnish the crisader symblo on your tunic. rug Sep 2015 #45
Probably refugees from churches like yours. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #47
sorry, i don't deal in suppositions. rug Sep 2015 #49
Doesn't seem to be a lot of data. Julia Gillard, former Aussie PM is atheist and was AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #56
If I find one I will. rug Sep 2015 #59
It would be worthy of an Op. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #61
Damn! Superb takedown. Lordquinton Sep 2015 #21
One of eight atheists is not 20 churches with 50 members. rug Sep 2015 #36
Look at you, so desperate to mis-frame these demographics. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #43
Oh get over yourself. rug Sep 2015 #46
Pew didn't ask the question, but I have yet to meet one that was always an atheist. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #48
Hmm, don't you preach we are all born atheist? rug Sep 2015 #50
We are. Then people begin programming us with doctrine AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #52
In that case, compared to the then extant DSM. rug Sep 2015 #53
Impossible. It was removed from the DSM 5 years before I was born. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #57
Do you know when the Catechism was written? rug Sep 2015 #58
Within a year. Problem is, Persona Humana is still in force, is it not? AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #60
I did some checking. The process of writing the new catechism was begn in 1985. rug Sep 2015 #62
Did you forget something? AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #66
Let me check. rug Sep 2015 #67
Allow me. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #69
1. No one said a thing about secularists. rug Sep 2015 #70
You said compared, not based on in post 53. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #71
Is that it? Seriously? rug Sep 2015 #72
Comparison is similar. So what. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #73
To the entirety of your posts in this subthread, I say so what. rug Sep 2015 #74
That's lovely. DSM is fixed. When is your church going to drop the raging homophobia? AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #75
See #74. rug Sep 2015 #76
Let me know when you're done with recursive loops and want to answer the question. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #77
As soon as you're done quibbling with idioms. rug Sep 2015 #78
If you're going to dismiss that as quibbling, we're done. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #79
That's what it always comes down to, doesn't it? cleanhippie Sep 2015 #80
Speaking of "superfluous nonsense", weigh in. "Compared to" or "in contrast to"? rug Sep 2015 #82
You were getting at something while playing coy. I tried to interpret. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #83
And you ignored the question Lordquinton Sep 2015 #63
And you will never get over yourself. rug Sep 2015 #64
Holy non sequitors batman! Lordquinton Sep 2015 #65
Do you often opine, thinking of what others will think of you? rug Sep 2015 #68
do you often dodge questions? nt Lordquinton Sep 2015 #86
I believe you just did. rug Sep 2015 #87
So that's a yes? nt Lordquinton Sep 2015 #88
Yes, you did. rug Sep 2015 #89
I did point out that you're still not answering the question Lordquinton Sep 2015 #90
Where's urbscotty with one of those wrongly worded memes when you need one? cleanhippie Sep 2015 #81
He keeps trying he might accidentally get one right. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #85
I understand you fervently believe religion represents all that is right and rational in humanity. Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #92
Your understanding is flawed. rug Sep 2015 #93
no more than yours Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #94
Wow, dude! That's like an epic Hitchslap, delivered with no mercy whatsoever. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #28
"Oh!" rug Sep 2015 #37
Here is your award for administering such an epic beatdown. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #29
In your dreams. rug Sep 2015 #38
If people don't believe in contraception, they don't have to use it.q SheilaT Aug 2015 #9
The GOP and the RCC edhopper Sep 2015 #24
Can anyone think of the "science and moral convictions" they claim to believe muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #25
WTF???? Faux pas Sep 2015 #26
Does the company have to prove that moral stance or can they claim anything willy-nilly? DetlefK Sep 2015 #27
IIRC, Hobby Lobby won based on RFRA. Jim__ Sep 2015 #30
He's basing it on the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifthe Amemdment, rug Sep 2015 #39
Every sperm is sacred HassleCat Sep 2015 #51
PLEASE let there be an animal-rights activist employer Freddie Sep 2015 #54
That is an excellent example. rug Sep 2015 #55
SHARIA!!! pansypoo53219 Sep 2015 #84
Using hormonal birth control results in fewer dead zygotes than no birth control muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #91
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Judge Allows Moral, Not J...»Reply #74