Religion

rug

(82,333 posts)

87. I believe you just did.

Reply to Lordquinton (Reply #86)

Thu Sep 3, 2015, 01:48 PM

Sep 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

94 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge Allows Moral, Not Just Religious, Contraception Exemptions [View all] rug Aug 2015 OP

Dammit. What is "moral" about putting a girl's or woman's life in jeopardy? elfin Aug 2015 #1

The judge was appointed by Dubya on September 10, 2011. rug Aug 2015 #2

I believe you meant to type 2001, rather than 2011. No Vested Interest Sep 2015 #32

Mea culps. Fixed. rug Sep 2015 #33

What does the morality of an employer..... AlbertCat Sep 2015 #31

what about viagara? what if someone DesertFlower Aug 2015 #3

In theory, this judge should bar that as well. rug Aug 2015 #4

well cialis is basically the same. DesertFlower Aug 2015 #5

Could be, his prose is wooden. rug Aug 2015 #6

Nice smokescreen you found there. AtheistCrusader Aug 2015 #7

Like it or not, atheism is not all rainbows, progress and paradise. rug Aug 2015 #8

I did a little googling of my own. Less than 12% of atheists and agnostics are anti abortion. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #10

12? 1 out of 8? That's higher than I thought. rug Sep 2015 #34

It is for now, with A/A's being less than 15 percent of the populace AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #40

I especially like that last link you found, looks like a dead geocities page from the 90's AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #11

Second link from the bottom, 10 comments, 80% religious. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #12

Third link from the bottom, Kate Goodwin could only cite herself as a non-religious AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #13

Fourth link from the bottom, 7,000 followers or less, worldwide. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #14

Fifth link from the bottom, less than 2k followers, can only cite a source AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #15

Sixth link from the bottom was a pro life white male catholic before he became an atheist. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #16

7th from the bottom, ANOTHER president of pro-life Atheists? Either you're double dipping or AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #17

8th link from the bottom is the same asshole as link 7, and 4, or 5, I forget. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #18

Ninth link from the bottom is just another duplicate to the blog roll of a site you already linked. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #19

And the first link won't load, but I see you're triple-dipping again. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #20

BRILLIANT!!! You so totally rock, dude! beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #22

the technique is wrong anyway. The correct way to do a google gish gallop is to separate each Warren Stupidity Sep 2015 #23

0.32 seconds is all I chose to devote to it. rug Sep 2015 #35

Wrong. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #41

!2% is 12%. Put any adjective on it you want. rug Sep 2015 #42

In contrast to Catholics, 'statistical noise'. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #44

But it does tarnish the crisader symblo on your tunic. rug Sep 2015 #45

Probably refugees from churches like yours. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #47

sorry, i don't deal in suppositions. rug Sep 2015 #49

Doesn't seem to be a lot of data. Julia Gillard, former Aussie PM is atheist and was AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #56

If I find one I will. rug Sep 2015 #59

It would be worthy of an Op. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #61

Damn! Superb takedown. Lordquinton Sep 2015 #21

One of eight atheists is not 20 churches with 50 members. rug Sep 2015 #36

Look at you, so desperate to mis-frame these demographics. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #43

Oh get over yourself. rug Sep 2015 #46

Pew didn't ask the question, but I have yet to meet one that was always an atheist. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #48

Hmm, don't you preach we are all born atheist? rug Sep 2015 #50

We are. Then people begin programming us with doctrine AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #52

In that case, compared to the then extant DSM. rug Sep 2015 #53

Impossible. It was removed from the DSM 5 years before I was born. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #57

Do you know when the Catechism was written? rug Sep 2015 #58

Within a year. Problem is, Persona Humana is still in force, is it not? AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #60

I did some checking. The process of writing the new catechism was begn in 1985. rug Sep 2015 #62

Did you forget something? AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #66

Let me check. rug Sep 2015 #67

Allow me. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #69

1. No one said a thing about secularists. rug Sep 2015 #70

You said compared, not based on in post 53. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #71

Is that it? Seriously? rug Sep 2015 #72

Comparison is similar. So what. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #73

To the entirety of your posts in this subthread, I say so what. rug Sep 2015 #74

That's lovely. DSM is fixed. When is your church going to drop the raging homophobia? AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #75

See #74. rug Sep 2015 #76

Let me know when you're done with recursive loops and want to answer the question. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #77

As soon as you're done quibbling with idioms. rug Sep 2015 #78

If you're going to dismiss that as quibbling, we're done. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #79

That's what it always comes down to, doesn't it? cleanhippie Sep 2015 #80

Speaking of "superfluous nonsense", weigh in. "Compared to" or "in contrast to"? rug Sep 2015 #82

You were getting at something while playing coy. I tried to interpret. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #83

And you ignored the question Lordquinton Sep 2015 #63

And you will never get over yourself. rug Sep 2015 #64

Holy non sequitors batman! Lordquinton Sep 2015 #65

Do you often opine, thinking of what others will think of you? rug Sep 2015 #68

do you often dodge questions? nt Lordquinton Sep 2015 #86

I believe you just did. rug Sep 2015 #87

So that's a yes? nt Lordquinton Sep 2015 #88

Yes, you did. rug Sep 2015 #89

I did point out that you're still not answering the question Lordquinton Sep 2015 #90

Where's urbscotty with one of those wrongly worded memes when you need one? cleanhippie Sep 2015 #81

He keeps trying he might accidentally get one right. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #85

I understand you fervently believe religion represents all that is right and rational in humanity. Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #92

Your understanding is flawed. rug Sep 2015 #93

no more than yours Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #94

Wow, dude! That's like an epic Hitchslap, delivered with no mercy whatsoever. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #28

"Oh!" rug Sep 2015 #37

Here is your award for administering such an epic beatdown. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #29

In your dreams. rug Sep 2015 #38

If people don't believe in contraception, they don't have to use it.q SheilaT Aug 2015 #9

The GOP and the RCC edhopper Sep 2015 #24

Can anyone think of the "science and moral convictions" they claim to believe muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #25

WTF???? Faux pas Sep 2015 #26

Does the company have to prove that moral stance or can they claim anything willy-nilly? DetlefK Sep 2015 #27

IIRC, Hobby Lobby won based on RFRA. Jim__ Sep 2015 #30

He's basing it on the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifthe Amemdment, rug Sep 2015 #39

Every sperm is sacred HassleCat Sep 2015 #51

PLEASE let there be an animal-rights activist employer Freddie Sep 2015 #54

That is an excellent example. rug Sep 2015 #55

SHARIA!!! pansypoo53219 Sep 2015 #84

Using hormonal birth control results in fewer dead zygotes than no birth control muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #91