Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
54. Never judge a book by its cover.
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 05:25 PM
Sep 2015

Except when you already know the author is ridiculous.


Like I said elsewhere....


This book is for theists...scared poor poor put upon theist.

Werleman is just a New Religious Entrepreneur .... like Kim Davis. Milking whoever gets caught in their sticky mess. Laughing all the way to the bank.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Did he plagiarize parts of his new book too? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #1
Hemant and Coyne already covered that today - and not with year old posts. rug Sep 2015 #2
Oh good, then you'll enjoy this too: beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #4
It looks like his targets are squealing on schedule. rug Sep 2015 #7
What apologists? AlbertCat Sep 2015 #3
No, the ones running around steering their readers to each others' blogs rug Sep 2015 #8
Someone sure is scared those big bad atheists are going to steal their binkie. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #9
This book is written for frightened theists AlbertCat Sep 2015 #49
Reminds me of what Ray Comfort wrote about Charles Darwin. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #51
He simply misspelled "debunkers" Rob H. Sep 2015 #79
He simply misspelled "debunkers" AlbertCat Sep 2015 #80
Gonna put this right next to this other one on my reading list tkmorris Sep 2015 #5
Somehow, I don't think they're laughing. rug Sep 2015 #10
dunno, the NAs might be on their arc downward already: Muslims are fighting ISIS, a religious left MisterP Sep 2015 #6
The substance of the decline aside, the mechanics of the polenics here is a wonder to behold. rug Sep 2015 #11
they've been saying "religion has only a decade left" since the 1900s because chemical equations MisterP Sep 2015 #14
How long have Christians been predicting the Second Coming? Fumesucker Sep 2015 #19
Happy birthday btw or am I mistaken? jakeXT Sep 2015 #20
With the OP being a pristine example of wondrous polemics Fumesucker Sep 2015 #18
Oh, he's flailing too. rug Sep 2015 #44
But I always root for the underdog AlbertCat Sep 2015 #50
No, more like those sibjected to intermet swarming based primarily on personal attack. rug Sep 2015 #60
Who are you? AlbertCat Sep 2015 #64
It is indeed a typo. rug Sep 2015 #68
So you like this guy edhopper Sep 2015 #12
Werleman is a liar and a despicable bigot. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #13
Werleman isn't just a plagiarist and a bigot... Rob H. Sep 2015 #16
I don't know if rug follows him on twitter but it wouldn't surprise me. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #17
It can be two things nt Rob H. Sep 2015 #15
It appears that is the case. edhopper Sep 2015 #59
You guessed right. nt Curmudgeoness Sep 2015 #21
He makes some very good points, most of which are provern by the mob reaction to his book. rug Sep 2015 #33
Oh please, the reaction is to HIM, and his biases. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #37
Refreshing of you to admit the torches are all fueled by ad hominems. rug Sep 2015 #41
I just see you, peddling the words of a bigot as if it has any meaning beyond that of a personal AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #48
Oh, calling out assholes is bigotry now? rug Sep 2015 #61
No, Werleman is a bigot. Per his tweets. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #69
You really don't want to measre bigotry by the tweets of famous atheists. rug Sep 2015 #70
We've been down this road. Got some new material to share? AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #72
If you insist, I'll post it as I come upon it. rug Sep 2015 #73
By all means. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #74
Can't tell which. AlbertCat Sep 2015 #52
Your pal Werleman seems SUCH a charming fellow! tkmorris Sep 2015 #22
Seems he was on their bandwagon five or six years ago. rug Sep 2015 #34
Oh boy, now you've done it. Starboard Tack Sep 2015 #23
Cited a bigot and an asshole, despite those attributes just because he has a common enemy? AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #24
Sounds like a contest for bigots. Starboard Tack Sep 2015 #25
What the hell do I need a leader for? AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #26
Hopefully you don't. Starboard Tack Sep 2015 #28
You mean, matters of unbelief. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #32
Absolutely not. Starboard Tack Sep 2015 #42
Some of us are trying to protect our existence. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #46
Unfortunately, many feel the need to be led. AlbertCat Sep 2015 #53
Did you just call rug a bigot, for starting this thread? muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #29
Hi Muriel Starboard Tack Sep 2015 #30
Atheist bigots like people who compare same sex marriage to marrying bicycles and animals? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #55
Ah, there it is, right on cue. rug Sep 2015 #62
No, rug was trying to stir things up for shits and giggles. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #36
You must be confusing me with one of your compadres. rug Sep 2015 #39
Yup. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #45
No, he didn't. rug Sep 2015 #38
struggle4progress may be the one you're waiting for muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #43
They're doing it to themselves. rug Sep 2015 #35
Post removed Post removed Sep 2015 #27
I'm sorry, from the title alone I view this book to be as credible as "Liberal Fascism" by Jonah... Humanist_Activist Sep 2015 #31
Never judge a book by its cover. rug Sep 2015 #40
B-but, isn't that what covers are for? Starboard Tack Sep 2015 #47
Knee jerk reactions serve the same purpose. rug Sep 2015 #63
The cover of Asimov's 'Foundation' led me to pick up an join a great story when I was 7. AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #71
Never judge a book by its cover. AlbertCat Sep 2015 #54
Ah, "the author is ridiculous." rug Sep 2015 #65
Can't judge it by the cover Lordquinton Sep 2015 #58
Why not? I find the title to be, how shall we say, extremely exaggerated... Humanist_Activist Sep 2015 #81
I think Trajan is the smartest one in this thread Lordquinton Sep 2015 #56
Agreed! beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #57
#4 is already there waiting. rug Sep 2015 #67
Post removed Post removed Sep 2015 #66
I can think of at least five who are much smarter. AlbertCat Sep 2015 #75
"altering on such a post" Why Albert, is that a typo? rug Sep 2015 #76
Why Albert, is that a typo? AlbertCat Sep 2015 #77
I only saw two Lordquinton Sep 2015 #78
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»CJ Werleman published &qu...»Reply #54