Religion

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)

42. I'm sorry sir, this needs to be in CYMK, we can't use RGB

Reply to Lordquinton (Reply #34)

Mon Sep 14, 2015, 08:20 PM

Sep 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Office depot involved in religious discrimination printing tiff [View all] rug Sep 2015 OP

�restoring respect in law for life, family, and religious liberty.� longship Sep 2015 #1

What do you think of Office Depot's decision not to print the flyer? rug Sep 2015 #3

It seems to me that mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2015 #4

The first paragraph has a link to a pdf of the flyer. I can't link pdfs. rug Sep 2015 #9

Thanks. Neither can I. mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2015 #11

Well, I would have looked it over. longship Sep 2015 #10

I would not have printed that flyer. longship Sep 2015 #16

What you are saying is in effect that discrimnation is alright in serving the public if it's Leontius Sep 2015 #20

No, it's lying that I am against. longship Sep 2015 #22

Slip, slide, shift Leontius Sep 2015 #23

I think I have been consistent about my objections. longship Sep 2015 #24

Quite consistent you would obey the law as you saw fit to obey it just like Kim Davis in Kentucky. Leontius Sep 2015 #25

Sorry, I would not support her lies either. longship Sep 2015 #26

Yours reads like any other religious extremist view of the law. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #29

As usual your hypocrisy reeks Leontius Sep 2015 #31

I was waiting for this line to pop up Lordquinton Sep 2015 #33

Another Jim Crow supporter coming out from under his rock Leontius Sep 2015 #36

You are so far off here, you're not even wrong Lordquinton Sep 2015 #39

Not from where I'm sitting Leontius Sep 2015 #40

Those are all just words coming from you, no meaning Lordquinton Sep 2015 #41

No I'm calling your defense of discrimination disgusting Leontius Sep 2015 #43

So you're defending someone who wanted to discriminate against discrimination? Lordquinton Sep 2015 #44

I'm "yelling" at someone who does not support equal protection of the law for all people. Leontius Sep 2015 #45

You should be ashamed of yourself! What is wrong with you? cleanhippie Sep 2015 #55

They invited her to use the self-serve printer SwankyXomb Sep 2015 #17

Me, too Rob H. Sep 2015 #21

Yeah "reasonable accomodation" Leontius Sep 2015 #46

Lol. You obviously have no idea what the meaning of words are. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #48

Yes it is and if you can't see it I can only pity your lack of wisdom and discernment . Leontius Sep 2015 #49

Keep the pity for yourself. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #50

Post removed Post removed Sep 2015 #53

Wrong answer, Leo. Act_of_Reparation Sep 2015 #56

They are determined to have special rights for Christians. drm604 Sep 2015 #2

What special right would that be? NT mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2015 #5

The right to not have to follow the same rules as everyone else. drm604 Sep 2015 #7

No, it isn't. Please read the flyer. NT mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2015 #12

Sorry. I don't get your point. drm604 Sep 2015 #14

I did read the flyer. Promethean Sep 2015 #27

What happens if Office Depot says that they have religious objections to such graphic hate speech? drm604 Sep 2015 #6

This is worse. It has a corporate objection. rug Sep 2015 #8

It's neither graphic nor hate speech. NT mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2015 #13

From the article: drm604 Sep 2015 #15

And calling them 'evil' and corrupt' might be hate material too (nt) muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #18

TIFF lol AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #19

Shoulda brought jpgs Lordquinton Sep 2015 #34

I'm sorry sir, this needs to be in CYMK, we can't use RGB AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #42

Update. rug Sep 2015 #28

It probably makes business sense for Office Depot to, as much as possible, avoid controversial ... Jim__ Sep 2015 #30

Skirmishes like this can blow up quickly. rug Sep 2015 #32

What are your thoughts on this manner? Lordquinton Sep 2015 #35

Rephrase your question without inaccurate assumptions if you want an answer. rug Sep 2015 #37

So you are claiming the flier wasn't full of hate and lies? Lordquinton Sep 2015 #38

So, are you claiming commercial printers should print only material that is full of love and truth? rug Sep 2015 #47

Man, you do anything to defend your faith Lordquinton Sep 2015 #58

And you will do anything to advance your hatred of it. rug Sep 2015 #59

Looks like you got the typical deflection. cleanhippie Sep 2015 #51

What defection is that? rug Sep 2015 #52

If I said yes Lordquinton Sep 2015 #54

He's as bad as answering questions as you are. rug Sep 2015 #60

Really? Lordquinton Sep 2015 #62

Varied. Do you mean legal access or something else? rug Sep 2015 #63

Wow, good job! Lordquinton Sep 2015 #64

I haven't given you an answer at all. I asked you to clarify your question. rug Sep 2015 #66

OK, let's go with legal access Curmudgeoness Sep 2015 #65

It must remain legal. rug Sep 2015 #67

Thanks for the clear answer, Curmudgeoness Sep 2015 #68

That's an argument to disarm the Bible argument. rug Sep 2015 #72

How do you feel about the possibility AtheistCrusader Sep 2015 #69

Whether it is a sin or not is irrelevant to whether it should be legal. rug Sep 2015 #71

I disagree. I think declaring abortion 'bad' shames every woman who has Warren Stupidity Sep 2015 #70

I think abortion is good. It saves lives PeaceNikki Sep 2015 #74

which she printed elsewhere and distributed at her church, AlbertCat Sep 2015 #57

Happens all the time. rug Sep 2015 #61

She chose to go elsewhere Lordquinton Sep 2015 #73