Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thucythucy

(9,107 posts)
13. Archeology and other disciplines would be unable to prove the existence
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:01 AM
Dec 2015

of 99.9% of all the humans who ever lived prior to the 18th century.

Most people down through the ages were illiterate, and thus left no records themselves, and were for the most part unrecorded as individuals by any government or religious entity of the time. This certainly would have been true of a peasant or semi-skilled craftsman such as Jesus, living in obscurity for most of his life. Even his execution probably wouldn't have been noted--the Romans executed thousands of slaves involved in the rebellion led by Spartacus, how many of their names were recorded? Did those executed slaves then not exist?

And even if such evidence of their existence did at one time exist, it may well have been lost in the intervening centuries. Most of Homer's works didn't survive. He supposedly wrote many longer epics, and hundreds of "Homeric hymns"--but only the Odyssey and the Iliad have come down to us.

Come to think of it, what archaeological or other evidence do we have that Homer existed? I don't think his name even appears in writing until at least a century or more after his alleged life and death.

As I've said before, absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

EEEEEUW! BlueCaliDem Dec 2015 #1
Assumes facts not in evidence. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #2
The existence of a cult-leader "Jesus Christ" is historically pretty much verified. DetlefK Dec 2015 #3
Evidence that tall lumberjacks named Paul existed... trotsky Dec 2015 #4
"pretty much" AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #5
Well, you can't rule out witness-testimony entirely. DetlefK Dec 2015 #7
Trying to align the four as-documented gospels reveals flaws in the idea of an eyewitness account. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #8
The biblical Jesus is a different topic. DetlefK Dec 2015 #9
But the biblical Jesus is the one it is claimed was given a vinegar-soaked sponge. trotsky Dec 2015 #11
Archaeology and other disciplines have failed to prove that a historical jesus certainly existed. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #12
Archeology and other disciplines would be unable to prove the existence thucythucy Dec 2015 #13
There are few if any academic claims for the historicity Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #16
Have I ever used Socrates thucythucy Dec 2015 #17
well regarding spartacus, the leader, spartacus was mentioned by name. Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #18
We know Spartacus by name thucythucy Dec 2015 #20
We know Homer existed edhopper Dec 2015 #19
There's evidence that a historical Jesus existed and that he was crucified Major Nikon Dec 2015 #22
See my post 25, thucythucy Dec 2015 #26
The problem is we aren't talking about some random troublemaker Major Nikon Dec 2015 #30
"Is very telling" thucythucy Dec 2015 #32
That's kind of the whole point Major Nikon Dec 2015 #33
Or news just took time back then to travel, thucythucy Dec 2015 #34
I don't doubt there was an actual person behind Christianity Major Nikon Dec 2015 #35
If by "Biblical Jesus" you mean the whole turn water into wine thucythucy Dec 2015 #36
Even beyond that Major Nikon Dec 2015 #37
Well except when he isn't and is instead described Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #15
There is no eyewitness testimony for the existence of Jesus. stopbush Dec 2015 #29
Do tell Goblinmonger Dec 2015 #6
No really that isn't "verified" as there is zero Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #14
There were other "gods" in history just like him. Manifestor_of_Light Dec 2015 #24
All of these supernatural aspects of divinity thucythucy Dec 2015 #25
Nope. stopbush Dec 2015 #28
Because they thought he could turn it into water? cleanhippie Dec 2015 #10
No, it was probably because the people entrusted with executing criminals thucythucy Dec 2015 #21
Considering that it's most likely a fabricated story, I don't get too worked up abut it. cleanhippie Dec 2015 #23
Fortunately, the whole Buy-bull is make believe. stopbush Dec 2015 #27
No not really Person 2713 Dec 2015 #31
Let's see. Is it because some people really love torture porn? Iggo Dec 2015 #38
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Do you really want to kno...»Reply #13