Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

stone space

(6,498 posts)

8. The equation listed is pretty useless in proving God's existence.

Reply to pokerfan (Original post)

Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:40 AM

Jan 2016

3+3=5 would, however, be a very useful Lemma towards that goal, and a Lemma from which God's existence would follow quite easily as an immediate Corollally, along with many other useful results.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

3 + 3 = 6 is Proof of God�s Existence? [View all] pokerfan Jan 2016 OP

You left out "According to a Creationist Video". rug Jan 2016 #1

Yeah, because "According to a Catholic video" is so much more credible! cleanhippie Jan 2016 #5

If you think the Creation Museum is as credible as the Vatican Observatory, I can't help you. rug Jan 2016 #6

I don't see the difference between the two Lordquinton Jan 2016 #10

(a+b^n)/n = x MisterP Jan 2016 #2

Yes it's proof. Glamrock Jan 2016 #3

I'm buying it safeinOhio Jan 2016 #4

they don't want to make the same mistake as Lucas... NeoGreen Jan 2016 #7

Too funny! Glamrock Jan 2016 #9

The equation listed is pretty useless in proving God's existence. stone space Jan 2016 #8