Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Near death, explained [View all]moobu2
(4,822 posts)40. They're glossing over important details in the Pam Reynolds case that do not support their theory.
This is easily explained I think. In the very next paragraph from the article it says at approximately 8:40 a.m. Pam Reynolds claimed she "pop out of her body and hover above it, watching as doctors worked on her body".
Read this.
At 8:40 a.m., the tray of surgical instruments was uncovered, and Robert Spetzler began cutting through Pams skull with a special surgical saw that produced a noise similar to a dental drill. At this moment, Pam later said, she felt herself pop out of her body and hover above it, watching as doctors worked on her body.
The big glaring issue there is that she wasn't near death when the alleged out of body incident began, she was simply under general anesthesia at that point which was administered about 7:15 a.m. According to the article Mrs. Reynolds heart was stopped at around 11:05 a.m. and her EEG flattened into total silence a few minutes later.
Read this.
"At 11:25 a.m., the team tilted up the head of the operating table, turned off the bypass machine, and drained the blood from her body. Pamela Reynolds was clinically dead. "
So basically the best case is this Pam Reynolds out of Body experience episode but if you read carefully doesn't even fit a timeline that coincides with her clinical death.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You may be right but wouldn't it be great if it really was true. I know it would give me a happy
southernyankeebelle
Apr 2012
#28
Was your experience similar or different from the experiences described by others?
cbayer
Apr 2012
#10
That's what I most often read about and agree that it is much different than an OOBE.
cbayer
Apr 2012
#22
.(mumble mumble)...Unlike we scientifically enlightened beings, you mere mortals have misinterpreted
AlbertCat
Apr 2012
#63
I hate to say it tama, but those in glass houses should really avoid throwing stones. (nt)
eqfan592
Apr 2012
#76
The quote is in reference to the idea of conciousness returning to a body whos brain has decayed.
eqfan592
Apr 2012
#77
Luckily, the lady had never read anything about what to expect from a NDE beforehand.
mr blur
Apr 2012
#16
I've been interested since 2000 when I lost my son...then believe I got many messages from him.
Auntie Bush
Apr 2012
#43
Too bad intentionally putting people, especially blind people, in situations which may
ZombieHorde
Apr 2012
#33