Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
12. Sorry, but no
Sun Apr 22, 2012, 10:13 PM
Apr 2012

Anything which might reasonably (or even unreasonably, in some cases) be expected to influence a candidate's behavior, actions or policies after they're elected is something that voters have a right to know about. Religion and religious beliefs absolutely qualify. You know this, just as you know that religious fundamentalists have a penchant for saying (or not saying) whatever will get them elected, and then charging ahead once they're entrenched.

Not all voters may care, but the ones that do should not be required to wait until AFTER a candidate is elected and is pursuing policies in furtherance of their religious beliefs to find out about them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»No religious test is a go...»Reply #12