Religion

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)

112. If you don't like the movie Friday

Wed Feb 10, 2016, 08:33 PM

Feb 2016

then there is no hope for you.

And I didn't even try calling you racist for not liking the movie! See how that's done.

ETA: In case you only understanding of that phrase is from your wonderful Urban Dictionary, here's the clip from the movie

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

199 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bad arguments are bad arguments [View all] cleanhippie Feb 2016 OP

"There is no god. The arguments for god are pathetic and silly." Iggo Feb 2016 #1

And the more they try to bolster them with, for example, 'progressive theology', mr blur Feb 2016 #2

Captain Beefheart for the win. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2016 #6

And yet so many see that as bigotry. cleanhippie Feb 2016 #3

They've been brought up to expect that we treat them like children. Iggo Feb 2016 #4

You appear to believe that exposing Dawkins, and others, is somehow a defense of religion. rug Feb 2016 #5

I think you touch nil desperandum Feb 2016 #8

I can't disagree with a word of what you wrote. rug Feb 2016 #9

Pretty much a bunch of bullshit. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #11

With a title like that there's no need to read further. rug Feb 2016 #12

Your evasion skills are improving. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #14

There's no evasion at all. Your chest-thumping posts are not worth the time. rug Feb 2016 #15

Doubling down. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #16

Wiping my shoe. rug Feb 2016 #17

Better luck on the next alert. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #20

C'mom, AC. You hurt someone's feefees. Show some compassion, will ya? cleanhippie Feb 2016 #21

Let me guess. Juror 3 sent it to you. rug Feb 2016 #22

Unknown. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #24

You left out a word. rug Feb 2016 #30

Did I? AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #31

Yes, you did, as you did in post 11, "Namaste, motherfucker." rug Feb 2016 #38

I said 'unknown to me'. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #41

No. You said "Unknown." rug Feb 2016 #42

"The person who sent it to me was completely unknown to me." AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #44

It's a complusion. cleanhippie Feb 2016 #19

your compulsion must be snarking behind someone else. rug Feb 2016 #23

Don't you have a 40 day radio silence compulsion coming up? AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #33

Why don't you clarify that? rug Feb 2016 #36

Same thing you did last year. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #37

I did lots of things last year. Why don't you clarify yourself. rug Feb 2016 #39

Very funny. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #40

For someone who likes to throw arond the word "motherfucker", you're curiously reticent. rug Feb 2016 #43

I already made my point. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #45

No, you didn't. rug Feb 2016 #46

Um, no. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #47

Um, bullshit. rug Feb 2016 #48

Apparently I am not the only one with issues around crude language. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #49

Saying what you wrote is "bullshit" is hardly addressing you as "motherfuucker". rug Feb 2016 #50

You seem confused. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #51

"seem" is such a weasl word. rug Feb 2016 #55

Well, I can't know for sure if you're being deceptive, rather than confused. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #62

Namaste . . . . rug Feb 2016 #64

Namaste. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #72

"seem" is such a weasl word. AlbertCat Feb 2016 #67

You hit the nail on the head here Lordquinton Feb 2016 #18

Bwah ha ha ha! trotsky Feb 2016 #7

The fundamental (no pun intended) difference is glossed over Lordquinton Feb 2016 #10

What do anti-theist bigots use as a screen? rug Feb 2016 #13

Calling the RCC a "pedophile institution" Leontius Feb 2016 #25

Because it is in fact a mask to religious bigotry. rug Feb 2016 #28

How is it not? You should go see spotlight. Warren Stupidity Feb 2016 #32

And that's the difference. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #35

I don't see public schools shuffling around teachers to new districts and hiding their past AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #34

He wasn't talking about public schools Lordquinton Feb 2016 #52

Thank you, I totally missed that. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #53

Yep, the mask slipped Lordquinton Feb 2016 #54

I'm sure you did miss it. Leontius Feb 2016 #65

That wasn't the original problem. The comment was about the organization HARBORING them, shuffling AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #71

My original comment was about the abuse not the coverup if you are confused about that Leontius Feb 2016 #76

You said "the RCC". Not 'some priests that abused children.'. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #78

We have no disagrement about the problem of the cover-up. Leontius Feb 2016 #80

It has the apperance of impropriety from multiple levels. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #82

Do you think that the purpose of the Church was to enable? Leontius Feb 2016 #83

For the purposes of this question AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #85

So your answer is yes they moved these priests with the express intent to allow them to Leontius Feb 2016 #86

For some levels of the org, yes, it has that appearance. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #87

Quit weaseling, just answer Leontius Feb 2016 #89

It's not weaseling to acknowledge I do not know for certain. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #133

Bullshit Leontius Feb 2016 #134

That's rich coming from you Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #136

Yes I do and you have shown nothing to refute anything I said. Leontius Feb 2016 #139

You realize everyone can still see post 25 right? AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #143

Do you deny that there are sexual predators among Leontius Feb 2016 #146

Has the teachers union hidden and moved and ENABLED said predators, like the RCC has? AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #147

That was never my argument and I'm sure that if you really want to find an answer to your Leontius Feb 2016 #151

You said, in post 25, "THE RCC", not 'abusive priests'. You compared the actions of individual teach AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #154

I said appearance. Because it does. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #141

Again with insinuation and innuendo. Leontius Feb 2016 #144

They were deliberate acts, and frankly its probably due to indifference to children which has been.. Humanist_Activist Feb 2016 #150

Thanks for a direct and honest answer something that others seem unable to do. Leontius Feb 2016 #156

You are remarkably inconsistent. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #157

The issue is that, because religious organizations perpetuate this, and religion is given a... Humanist_Activist Feb 2016 #161

I don't know what your interest in my balls is, but they have nothing to do with this conversation. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #152

What a complete coward. Leontius Feb 2016 #153

If you say so. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #155

Well you could learn a great deal from Humanist Activist Leontius Feb 2016 #159

If you look carefully, there is little difference between what HA and I said. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #160

I only mentioned them because it was part of my argument that the motives was indifference... Humanist_Activist Feb 2016 #166

Your presence is required in this thread about the vatican saying it doesn't have to report. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #73

I remember hearing something about "mandatory reporter" Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #75

Next we'll learn how the Teamsters Unions are the SAME THING as vatican Rat Lines evacuating AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #77

Because that's all in your imagination? truebrit71 Feb 2016 #56

Did you seriously just say that Teacher Unions shelter pedophiles? Lordquinton Feb 2016 #57

Reading comprehension a big problem for you is it? Leontius Feb 2016 #60

No, I comprehended exactly what you said. Lordquinton Feb 2016 #61

The problem is I didn't make that claim. Leontius Feb 2016 #63

The problem is you made that comparisson Lordquinton Feb 2016 #91

No you conflated my question on abuse into that comparison I'm not taking blame for your Leontius Feb 2016 #95

So not only do you make wild, slanderous accusations while refusing to back them up Lordquinton Feb 2016 #104

I'm quite sure this will be complained about in other groups on DU Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #105

And your misrepresentions of what I said are yours and your friends so I won't hold it Leontius Feb 2016 #106

Its the cover-up and enabling of pedophiles by the Church, by shuffling them to unknowing... Humanist_Activist Feb 2016 #149

Really? Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #58

My Mother is a teacher Lordquinton Feb 2016 #59

So you are saying there is no problem with educators abusing children? Leontius Feb 2016 #68

Hey, just double down on it. That's awesome. Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #70

The problem is I didn't do that. Leontius Feb 2016 #79

Here's the problem I have with what you said. Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #96

I have nothing to appologize for everything I posted was true and backed by studies on this problem. Leontius Feb 2016 #99

Bye, Felicia n/t Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #100

A well reasoned response Leontius Feb 2016 #102

Read above for my well reasoned response Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #103

Only problem with that is the Dept of Education study had almost the same percent of Leontius Feb 2016 #108

Go ahead and post those. Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #111

When I become god of the internet I'll accept the responsibility for the error of others Leontius Feb 2016 #115

You shouldn't adopt sexist internet poses. rug Feb 2016 #110

If you don't like the movie Friday Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #112

Ice Cube movies are well known for respecting women. rug Feb 2016 #116

No. It's not calling someone a bitch Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #128

That's the comon use now. rug Feb 2016 #129

Yeah, I'll take it from you Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #130

Yes you will. As necessary. rug Feb 2016 #131

Confirmation of your answer to me is on display here. Leontius Feb 2016 #113

There's all sorts of privilege on display as well. rug Feb 2016 #117

There certanly is Lordquinton Feb 2016 #122

Hio many of those are yours, "Lord"? rug Feb 2016 #124

How about you? Lordquinton Feb 2016 #138

You're evading. Again. rug Feb 2016 #172

We can dig into the archives and find out who's evading Lordquinton Feb 2016 #175

What's your privilege, "Lord"? rug Feb 2016 #176

Evading now? Lordquinton Feb 2016 #177

What's your privilege, "Lord"? rug Feb 2016 #178

You have a past due question "Rug" Lordquinton Feb 2016 #179

What is wrong with you, quinton? rug Feb 2016 #180

Nothing Lordquinton Feb 2016 #181

Lol!. Nope not a single thing at all. rug Feb 2016 #182

The question is still lingering "Rug" Lordquinton Feb 2016 #183

Yes there is: What's your privilege, "Lord"? rug Feb 2016 #184

Something else to look up while you're at it Lordquinton Feb 2016 #185

I've known that acronym for years. As has virtually every other member of this site. rug Feb 2016 #186

Do you now? Lordquinton Feb 2016 #187

What's your privilege, "Lord"? rug Feb 2016 #188

But you still can't answer the question Lordquinton Feb 2016 #189

Of course I can, quinton. Most anyone on this board can. rug Feb 2016 #190

So why don't you? Lordquinton Feb 2016 #191

I find your bizarre behavior fascinating. rug Feb 2016 #192

Any time you accuse someone of dodging a question Lordquinton Feb 2016 #193

What's your privilege, "Lord"? rug Feb 2016 #194

We as in the many people here who ask you questions you run away from Lordquinton Feb 2016 #195

What's your privilege "Lord"? rug Feb 2016 #196

Stop evading Lordquinton Feb 2016 #197

Listen, "Lord", you should count your blessings I'm wasting this amount of time with you at all. rug Feb 2016 #198

Deflection after deflection Lordquinton Feb 2016 #199

I think it's page five of the playbook Leontius Feb 2016 #123

Don't forget the use of this: rug Feb 2016 #125

That one mostly comes with a distinct smell though. Leontius Feb 2016 #127

You've got most of those for sure Lordquinton Feb 2016 #137

WTF are you rambling on about now? Leontius Feb 2016 #140

And you were accusing me of poor reading comprehension Lordquinton Feb 2016 #162

In case you missed it I supplied three sources Leontius Feb 2016 #164

I missed those links in this thread Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #173

Did the teachers union say it's not sure it has to report it? AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #74

Does the name Matthew Lang of Illinois ring any bells for you? Leontius Feb 2016 #84

As others have noted, you've drawn a false equivalence here. LiberalAndProud Feb 2016 #66

Because it's absurd. Teachers' "massive child sexual abuse problem"? Are you being serious? mr blur Feb 2016 #69

You don't think that a possible 4.5 million instances of abuse is massive. Leontius Feb 2016 #81

Link, please. nt Curmudgeoness Feb 2016 #88

You don't know how to do an internet search. Leontius Feb 2016 #90

Your claim Lordquinton Feb 2016 #92

I already did my search if you want the facts do yours. Leontius Feb 2016 #94

OK, just searched and found nothing Lordquinton Feb 2016 #107

This message was self-deleted by its author Leontius Feb 2016 #109

Nope. Curmudgeoness Feb 2016 #93

Enjoy your ignorance Leontius Feb 2016 #97

As a former teacher, Curmudgeoness Feb 2016 #98

Take it up with the AAUW it's their estimate not mine. Leontius Feb 2016 #101

I suspect your numbers are conjecture, or your "research" is suspect. LiberalAndProud Feb 2016 #114

I absolutely agree that the RCC has failed to address this problem correctly. Leontius Feb 2016 #118

I found the article. I read it. The article clearly states that a study has not been LiberalAndProud Feb 2016 #119

All three sources agree on the extent of the problem Leontius Feb 2016 #120

You really think this is somehow equivalent? LiberalAndProud Feb 2016 #121

That's the problem you all seem to have you can't grasp the concept Leontius Feb 2016 #126

The criticism is of the response as much as the abuse itself. LiberalAndProud Feb 2016 #132

No I don't think it is. Leontius Feb 2016 #135

Well there we are, I suppose. Because I do think it is. LiberalAndProud Feb 2016 #142

I'm making no excuses I'm just questioning the motive and honesty of some posters on the issue. Leontius Feb 2016 #148

And yet... AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #158

Why do you continue to make inaccurate statements about what I have said? Leontius Feb 2016 #163

Because I can still see post 25, wherein you specified "the RCC". AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #165

I also specified "child sexual abuse problem" too didn't I Leontius Feb 2016 #167

A not-clever example of sleight of hand. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #168

You are right there is some conflation going on here but it's by you not me. Leontius Feb 2016 #169

Except of course, post 25 stands, for all to see what you actually said. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #170

As does your inability to understand it after repeatedly being corrected and your Leontius Feb 2016 #171

Except it doesn't say what you're backpedaling to say. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #174

He often does. What always amuses me Warpy Feb 2016 #26

That's so true. trotsky Feb 2016 #27

Which doesn't explain at all your squealing when Dawkins is critiqued, mostly by atheists. rug Feb 2016 #29

no one person DonCoquixote Feb 2016 #145