Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 11:15 AM Feb 2016

Scalia was a champion of traditional Catholicism [View all]

http://www.cruxnow.com/faith/2016/02/14/scalia-was-a-champion-of-traditional-catholicism/

Justice Antonin Scalia, a giant of American jurisprudence and a vocal defender of traditional Catholic morality, was fiercely protective of religion’s role in the public square, but he always insisted his faith did not impact his judicial rulings.

Scalia, who died Saturday at a ranch in West Texas where he was quail hunting, received the sacrament of the anointing of the sick, known colloquially as last rites, from a local priest, the Diocese of El Paso confirmed. The Rev. Mike Alcuino, who serves at a parish and several missions in the diocese, was called to the ranch where Scalia died at age 79.

...

But in the New York interview, Scalia spoke about his traditional Catholic beliefs, stating that he believes in heaven and hell (“Oh, of course I do.”) as well as the Devil.

“Of course! Yeah, he’s a real person. Hey, c’mon, that’s standard Catholic doctrine! Every Catholic believes that,” he said. “Most of mankind has believed in the Devil, for all of history. Many more intelligent people than you or me have believed in the Devil.”


Wow.
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
But he loved the death penalty n/t LiberalEsto Feb 2016 #1
Well sure. trotsky Feb 2016 #4
I can think of a small handfull of good decisions he sided with or wrote opinion for. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #2
His siding to protect flag burning as free expression skepticscott Feb 2016 #5
What's interesting is that he was as unlike the current Pope as it would be possible to be. MADem Feb 2016 #3
Um.. No..he was exactly like the current pope skepticscott Feb 2016 #6
Well, I disagree. I think they both had a long way to go, but Frank is further along his path. MADem Feb 2016 #7
Hogwash skepticscott Feb 2016 #8
See? I predicted your reaction! MADem Feb 2016 #9
Yes, you can predict that my reaction to nonsense skepticscott Feb 2016 #14
Aww, sez you! MADem Feb 2016 #15
See, you can't even be accurate about what you posted yourself just above skepticscott Feb 2016 #16
Well, I consider compassion an important virtue. A distinguishing one. Apparently, you do not! MADem Feb 2016 #17
You claimed that skepticscott Feb 2016 #18
No, I didn't say that. You need to read what people SAY, not "interpret" what you want them MADem Feb 2016 #19
What one doctrine does he hold differently than the current pope? Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #10
Who? Scalia? He holds nothing, he's dead. MADem Feb 2016 #11
Fine. Did he hold. Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #12
Are you sure those masses weren't in his native SPANISH? MADem Feb 2016 #13
Yeah, I know the difference Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #20
No...I don't have an obsessive need to visit pointless MADem Feb 2016 #22
So you have no policy they differ on Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #23
What you've "got" is a hatred of a religious leader. Like your pal in this thread. MADem Feb 2016 #24
What I've got it you making a claim you can't support Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #25
I am not "making a claim." I have a POV and you don't agree with it. Too bad for you. nt MADem Feb 2016 #26
Do you even understand what making a claim is? Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #28
Yes I do--and I'm not "arguing" with you. I have an opinion, and it is not a "claim." MADem Feb 2016 #29
Never studied argumentation, have you. Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #30
Look, professor, you can play your little "Let's have a fight" game all day, MADem Feb 2016 #33
I have a pretty good handle on what argumentation is. Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #34
Criticizing flawed doctrine might look like hatred of a religious leader, LiberalAndProud Feb 2016 #36
When the criticism becomes incessant and obsessive, it speaks for itself. nt MADem Feb 2016 #37
Yes, from time to time incessant and obsessive happens around, here and there. LiberalAndProud Feb 2016 #38
So does defense of bigotry Lordquinton Feb 2016 #40
That would only apply if that is happening. MADem Feb 2016 #41
So you claim that homophobic stances and actions are "warts?" Lordquinton Feb 2016 #42
If you can't bother to read, I'm not going to play this stupid little "so you" game. MADem Feb 2016 #43
Do you even read what you type? Lordquinton Feb 2016 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author Act_of_Reparation Feb 2016 #21
And now for something completely different . . . . rug Feb 2016 #27
"Traditional" Catholicism could also be said to require the execution of heretics... trotsky Feb 2016 #32
The literalism in Scalia's makup was rigid, it seems to me. LiberalAndProud Feb 2016 #39
Drinks a lot, bigoted elitist, then tells it to the priest on Saturday? Zambero Feb 2016 #31
You underestimate what people are capable of in ten minutes. rug Feb 2016 #35
Some claim he wasn't like most Catholics Lordquinton Feb 2016 #45
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Scalia was a champion of ...»Reply #0