Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,591 posts)
6. It implies a semi-feudal right of ownership of the employee's health
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:04 AM
Mar 2016

"It amounts to a “hijacking” of their health plans, he argued, a phrase later parroted by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy"

The health plans belong to each employee, surely? Their life, their health. An employer has a duty, thanks to the American system, of care, which means contributing to funding (which is in their own interest anyway). But the health plan has to keep the employee alive and health 24 hours a day, not just at work. The idea that an employee can 'hijack' their own health plan by getting an insurer and the government to arrange contraceptive coverage seems to show they regard employers as having a lien on employees' bodies.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Can Religious Groups Igno...»Reply #6