Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
4. It's not the opposite but it is different.
Thu May 12, 2016, 09:15 AM
May 2016

Death is always, unmistakably, a loss. That's true whether one is a believer or a nonbeliever.

The difference is that most religions propose that, while a loss, that loss does not mean oblivion but that there is a hope beyond the loss. The needle to thread is how a person's death can be acknowledged while at the same time acknowledging his or her death.

For example, before Vatican 2, the priests wore black vestments, symbolizing the loss. Since Vatican 2, the priests wear white, symbolizing the hope of returning to God.

For nonbelievers, I imagine the balance is between marking the reality of death while embracing the life that was lived.

Psychologically and subjectively, the comfort of believing in the great circle of life versus going to heaven, is pretty much the same.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Proper religious funerals...»Reply #4