Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:11 AM May 2016

ACLU: The Federal Government Must Stop Catholic Hospitals From Harming More Women [View all]

Unfortunately, it’s increasingly a common story. A woman who is expecting a baby rushes to the hospital knowing that something is going horribly awry. Her heart rate is elevated, and she is bleeding. Sadly, the pregnancy is doomed. Crying and upset, she realizes she needs an abortion because she knows the pregnancy won’t make it to term. And she knows she is getting sicker.

But in this particular story, the hospital is Catholic, and the medical staff refused to provide an abortion based on Catholic directives that dictate what care can be provided in Catholic hospitals. Instead of providing her with appropriate care, the hospital kept her for six hours watching her bleed. They finally “discharged” her to the parking lot so that a relative could drive her to another hospital to get the care she needed. But by that time, she had lost so much blood that she needed a transfusion of seven pints and emergency surgery.

This story is real, and so is this woman (who is thankfully alive). Her story is one of several complaints against Catholic hospitals – which take billions of taxpayer dollars to serve the public - that have been lodged with the federal agency that oversees hospitals.

We know that there are more complaints, including the one filed by Faith Groesbeck, a public health researcher, who discovered several stories of women denied proper emergency care during miscarriages at one Catholic hospital in Michigan. One woman described in Ms. Groesbeck’s complaint was turned away by the Catholic hospital twice while miscarrying and given only Tylenol for a potentially deadly infection. The woman ended up miscarrying by herself on the toilet at home.

--snip--

Hospitals violate the law when they refuse to provide emergency medical care or provide information about a patient’s condition. The federal government should systematically investigate Catholic hospitals and hold them accountable. No woman should rush to the hospital and fear for her life because of religious rules that force hospitals to turn patients away without providing the proper care.

If you have been denied proper care at a Catholic hospital, we’d like to hear from you.

https://www.aclu.org/blog/speak-freely/federal-government-must-stop-catholic-hospitals-harming-more-women
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Revoke their credentials and accreditdation. procon May 2016 #1
As we've been told right here, women can "just go to another hospital." cleanhippie May 2016 #2
Any and all can be thrown under the bus to protect their church. trotsky May 2016 #4
FOIA is a good thing struggle4progress May 2016 #3
If this were true, they'd have lost their accreditation long ago. rug May 2016 #5
Are you denying that this happened? cleanhippie May 2016 #6
That what happened? That Catholic hospitals do not offer abortions or rug May 2016 #7
So all complaints against them, and information so far dug up by the ACLU is false? n/t Humanist_Activist May 2016 #8
Post the complaints and we'll see. The article mentions "several" rug May 2016 #9
Those 5 were from a single hospital, and the only reason we are even aware of that much... Humanist_Activist May 2016 #10
It's a lot like arguing with a Trump supporter edhopper May 2016 #11
Only worse. cleanhippie May 2016 #22
Are you trying to say I sound like a trump supporter, ed? rug May 2016 #26
The directives are a given Evidence of widespread harm to women stemming from them is not. rug May 2016 #12
Do you not see the potential for harm, at the very least the directives are unclear and can lead... Humanist_Activist May 2016 #13
Absolutely. My objection is to the overstated claims that are now being made. rug May 2016 #14
We don't know if they are overstated or not, the ACLU seems quite concerned... Humanist_Activist May 2016 #15
If we don't know, they are overstated. rug May 2016 #16
Does it matter if they are or not? If its just a few hospitals that practice this, then that... Humanist_Activist May 2016 #17
Yes, and I'll tell you why. rug May 2016 #18
I frankly don't care about OP's agenda, I care about the larger issue, more and more hospitals... Humanist_Activist May 2016 #19
Don't you see, HA, rug gives zero fucks about what the RCC does, it's me he has the issue with. cleanhippie May 2016 #23
"shining the light on the RCC"? rug May 2016 #25
You can act as obtuse about the point as you want, readers here know where you stand. cleanhippie May 2016 #20
I look forward to your next five OPs. rug May 2016 #21
I am told this thread generated 23 replies. Act_of_Reparation May 2016 #24
Not even rising to the level of "explanation" skepticscott May 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»ACLU: The Federal Governm...»Reply #0