Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Atheists Outraged by SPLC Branding Atheist Critics of Radical Islam 'Anti-Muslim Extremists' [View all]rug
(82,333 posts)6. Let's see exactly what these "dolts" in their "idiocy" say about Nawaz:
Maajid Nawaz
Maajid Nawaz is a British activist and part of the ex-radical circuit of former Islamists who use that experience to savage Islam. His story, which has been told repeatedly in the British and American press and in testimony to legislators as well, sounds compelling enough Nawaz says he grew up being attacked by neo-Nazi skinheads in the United Kingdom, spent almost four years in an Egyptian prison after joining a supposedly nonviolent Islamist group, but had a change of heart while imprisoned and then returned to England to work against the radicalization of Muslims. But major elements of his story have been disputed by former friends, members of his family, fellow jihadists and journalists, and the evidence suggests that Nawaz is far more interested in self-promotion and money than in any particular ideological dispute. He told several different versions of his story, emphasizing that he was deradicalized while in Egypt even though he in fact continued his Islamist agitation for months after returning. After starting the Quilliam Foundation, which he describes as an anti-extremism think tank, Nawaz sent a secret list to a top British security official that accused peaceful Muslim groups, politicians, a television channel and a Scotland Yard unit of sharing the ideology of terrorists, according to The Guardian. His Quilliam Foundation received more than 1.25 million pounds from the British government, but the government eventually decided to stop funding it. One of Nawazs biggest purported coups was getting anti-Muslim extremist Tommy Robinson to quit as head of the violence-prone English Defence League, trumpeting his departure at a press conference. But Robinson later said Quilliam had paid him some 8,000 British pounds to allow Nawaz to take credit for what he already planned to do. Shortly afterward, Robinson returned to anti-Muslim agitation with other groups.
IN HIS OWN WORDS
In the list sent to a top British security official in 2010, headlined Preventing Terrorism: Where Next for Britain? Quilliam wrote, The ideology of non-violent Islamists is broadly the same as that of violent Islamists; they disagree only on tactics. An official with Scotland Yards Muslim Contact Unit told The Guardian that [t]he list demonises a whole range of groups that in my experience have made valuable contributions to counter-terrorism.
In a Nov. 16, 2013, op-ed in the Daily Mail, Nawaz called for criminalizing the wearing of the veil, or niqab, in many public places, saying: It is not only reasonable, but our duty to insist individuals remove the veil when they enter identity-sensitive environments such as banks, airports, courts and schools.
According to a Jan. 24, 2014, report in The Guardian, Nawaz tweeted out a cartoon of Jesus and Muhammad despite the fact that many Muslims see it as blasphemous to draw Muhammad. He said that he wanted to carve out a space to be heard without constantly fearing the blasphemy charge.
Nawaz, who had described himself as a feminist, was filmed repeatedly trying to touch a naked lap dancer, according to an April 10, 2015, report in the Daily Mail. The paper apparently got the security film from the owner of a strip club who was incensed by Nawazs claims to be a religious Muslim.
Maajid Nawaz is a British activist and part of the ex-radical circuit of former Islamists who use that experience to savage Islam. His story, which has been told repeatedly in the British and American press and in testimony to legislators as well, sounds compelling enough Nawaz says he grew up being attacked by neo-Nazi skinheads in the United Kingdom, spent almost four years in an Egyptian prison after joining a supposedly nonviolent Islamist group, but had a change of heart while imprisoned and then returned to England to work against the radicalization of Muslims. But major elements of his story have been disputed by former friends, members of his family, fellow jihadists and journalists, and the evidence suggests that Nawaz is far more interested in self-promotion and money than in any particular ideological dispute. He told several different versions of his story, emphasizing that he was deradicalized while in Egypt even though he in fact continued his Islamist agitation for months after returning. After starting the Quilliam Foundation, which he describes as an anti-extremism think tank, Nawaz sent a secret list to a top British security official that accused peaceful Muslim groups, politicians, a television channel and a Scotland Yard unit of sharing the ideology of terrorists, according to The Guardian. His Quilliam Foundation received more than 1.25 million pounds from the British government, but the government eventually decided to stop funding it. One of Nawazs biggest purported coups was getting anti-Muslim extremist Tommy Robinson to quit as head of the violence-prone English Defence League, trumpeting his departure at a press conference. But Robinson later said Quilliam had paid him some 8,000 British pounds to allow Nawaz to take credit for what he already planned to do. Shortly afterward, Robinson returned to anti-Muslim agitation with other groups.
IN HIS OWN WORDS
In the list sent to a top British security official in 2010, headlined Preventing Terrorism: Where Next for Britain? Quilliam wrote, The ideology of non-violent Islamists is broadly the same as that of violent Islamists; they disagree only on tactics. An official with Scotland Yards Muslim Contact Unit told The Guardian that [t]he list demonises a whole range of groups that in my experience have made valuable contributions to counter-terrorism.
In a Nov. 16, 2013, op-ed in the Daily Mail, Nawaz called for criminalizing the wearing of the veil, or niqab, in many public places, saying: It is not only reasonable, but our duty to insist individuals remove the veil when they enter identity-sensitive environments such as banks, airports, courts and schools.
According to a Jan. 24, 2014, report in The Guardian, Nawaz tweeted out a cartoon of Jesus and Muhammad despite the fact that many Muslims see it as blasphemous to draw Muhammad. He said that he wanted to carve out a space to be heard without constantly fearing the blasphemy charge.
Nawaz, who had described himself as a feminist, was filmed repeatedly trying to touch a naked lap dancer, according to an April 10, 2015, report in the Daily Mail. The paper apparently got the security film from the owner of a strip club who was incensed by Nawazs claims to be a religious Muslim.
The SPLC has again done a fine job of identifying hate groups and their allies.
"Fueling this hatred has been the propaganda, the vast majority of it completely baseless, produced and popularized by a network of anti-Muslim extremists and their enablers."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Atheists Outraged by SPLC Branding Atheist Critics of Radical Islam 'Anti-Muslim Extremists' [View all]
rug
Oct 2016
OP
"Atheists" who hate Muslims are outraged, I'm sure, not to have their hatred validated by the SPLC.
stone space
Oct 2016
#1
Does shooting and bombing and killing them count as violence? You didn't answer.
stone space
Oct 2016
#24
Nawaz is a Muslim. That's how fucking stupid that SPLC web page is.
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2016
#3
Precisely. It's fucking stupid. It misrepresents him. It attacks him over unconnected things.
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2016
#7
So one letter to a paper opposing Quilliam, and 2 in favour of it,
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2016
#37
If you were paying attention, it statarts with the SPLC, which yoiu dismissed as "idiocy".
rug
Oct 2016
#38
I'll stick with his actual politics, as shown by his party membership and candidacy
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2016
#41
And that's the kind of opinion from you that shows disagreeing with you is so often right
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2016
#45
a vigorous anti-hate group vs. the people who still think Iraq was a good idea? tough pick
MisterP
Oct 2016
#50
Nawaz was in an Egyptian jail then. He never thought Iraq was a good idea
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2016
#55