Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There have been numerous posts at DU that 'explain" that Democrats cannot attract believers guillaumeb Dec 2016 #1
Whoever holds that position has either not read the gop platform or not read the New Testament. rug Dec 2016 #3
As long as mormons and catholics vote for things like Prop 8 in california AtheistCrusader Dec 2016 #10
Here's my outreach. HassleCat Dec 2016 #2
Here's your first problem: rug Dec 2016 #4
OK then. I disagree with you and the article. HassleCat Dec 2016 #6
No, the "we" is Democrats, religious and nonreligious, native and immigrant. rug Dec 2016 #8
Where does the USCCB fall in the laundry list of weath? AtheistCrusader Dec 2016 #11
It itself owns little. rug Dec 2016 #13
Rich people excel at insulating themselves from tax exposure. AtheistCrusader Dec 2016 #15
As correct as it is irrelevant. rug Dec 2016 #16
Committee on Canonical Affairs and Church Governance Archbishop Bernard Hebda of Saint Paul and Mi AtheistCrusader Dec 2016 #17
Sell your own bullshit, ac. They have no "tax exposure". rug Dec 2016 #18
If I were the church, I'd consider legal judgments related to sexual abuse a B&O tax at this point. AtheistCrusader Dec 2016 #19
Wait, you didn't mention pedophilia yet! Or misogyny. rug Dec 2016 #20
The entity I referenced that led to this point AtheistCrusader Dec 2016 #21
And the OP is about the Democratic Party's connections to religioius Democrats. rug Dec 2016 #23
Still awaiting your wizened deflections for post 10. Hop to. AtheistCrusader Dec 2016 #22
Keep waiting. You've exhausted your quota of bullshit. rug Dec 2016 #24
Oh please, in post 8 you prattle on about instruments of wealth all the while, dancing around the AtheistCrusader Dec 2016 #32
Jack Chick is straight Reformation material. Bretton Garcia Dec 2016 #38
Most religious Democrats (myself included) walkingman Dec 2016 #5
I Agree. n/t delisen Dec 2016 #7
Welcome to DU. rug Dec 2016 #9
Well, no... J_William_Ryan Dec 2016 #12
Do you actually think liberal Democrats who are religious do not know that? rug Dec 2016 #14
ENOUGH with the religious pandering, PERIOD. 50 Shades Of Blue Dec 2016 #25
Do you think the Democratic Party acknowledging that most Democrats are religious is pandering? rug Dec 2016 #27
Yes. 50 Shades Of Blue Dec 2016 #30
You're denying reality. rug Dec 2016 #31
Acknowledging and pandering to are the same thing when it comes to politicians and relgion. 50 Shades Of Blue Dec 2016 #34
Says who? Some opinions, especially the overwrought ones, are themselves fantasies. rug Dec 2016 #35
Not easy being a liberal believer. You get hit from the right as heritics and from the left for hrmjustin Dec 2016 #26
If Rug and Justin would outreach to conservatives, Bretton Garcia Dec 2016 #28
No, that's what David Silverman does. rug Dec 2016 #29
And the Pope Bretton Garcia Dec 2016 #39
By all means, elaborate. rug Dec 2016 #41
Pope Francis remembers the Good Samaritan Bretton Garcia Dec 2016 #43
Evangelicals wouldn't listen to me. hrmjustin Dec 2016 #40
What kind of outreach to religious liberals does he want that isn't also outreach to liberals? muriel_volestrangler Dec 2016 #33
How is an atheist liberal different from a religious liberal? rug Dec 2016 #36
I don't see why you're re-asking what I asked muriel_volestrangler Dec 2016 #37
Because a proper question usually contains its own answer. rug Dec 2016 #42
Looks like no one knows what Ed craves, then - not him, not me, not you muriel_volestrangler Dec 2016 #44
The article was pretty straightforward. rug Dec 2016 #45
But you cannot say what the extra-special treatment he wants for religious liberals is muriel_volestrangler Dec 2016 #46
Sure I can. For one thing, it's not "extra-special" treatment. rug Dec 2016 #47
Don't you consider President Obama a religious liberal? Don't you consider Hillary Clinton one? muriel_volestrangler Dec 2016 #48
Charles Pierce: "A Few Thoughts on the Democratic Party's 'Hostility' Toward Religion" muriel_volestrangler Dec 2016 #49
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»How About Some Democratic...»Reply #31