Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Ha - Right-wing website argues Jesus didn't want to help the poor at all [View all]beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)16. Religious "nones", Jews and other non-Christians overwhelmingly voted for Hillary in 2016:
How the faithful voted: A preliminary 2016 analysis
The 2016 presidential exit polling reveals little change in the political alignments of U.S. religious groups. Those who supported Republican candidates in recent elections, such as white born-again or evangelical Christians and white Catholics, strongly supported Donald Trump as well. Groups that traditionally backed Democratic candidates, including religious nones, Hispanic Catholics and Jews, were firmly in Hillary Clintons corner.
***
White Catholics also supported Trump over Clinton by a wide, 23-point margin (60% to 37%), rivaling Romneys 19-point victory among those in this group. Trumps strong support among white Catholics propelled him to a 7-point edge among Catholics overall (52% to 45%) despite the fact that Hispanic Catholics backed Clinton over Trump by a 41-point margin (67% to 26%).
Like Hispanic Catholics, religious nones and Jews were strong Clinton supporters. Indeed, nearly seven-in-ten religious nones voted for Clinton, as did 71% of Jews. Most people who identify with faiths other than Christianity or Judaism also favored Clinton over Trump, 62% to 29%.
Exit polls also follow another pattern from recent elections: Most weekly churchgoers backed Trump over Clinton, 56% to 40%. Those who said they attend religious services more sporadically (i.e., somewhere between a few times a month and a few times a year) were closely divided. And, those who said they dont attend religious services at all backed Clinton over Trump by a 31-point margin (62% to 31%).
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/how-the-faithful-voted-a-preliminary-2016-analysis/
The 2016 presidential exit polling reveals little change in the political alignments of U.S. religious groups. Those who supported Republican candidates in recent elections, such as white born-again or evangelical Christians and white Catholics, strongly supported Donald Trump as well. Groups that traditionally backed Democratic candidates, including religious nones, Hispanic Catholics and Jews, were firmly in Hillary Clintons corner.
***
White Catholics also supported Trump over Clinton by a wide, 23-point margin (60% to 37%), rivaling Romneys 19-point victory among those in this group. Trumps strong support among white Catholics propelled him to a 7-point edge among Catholics overall (52% to 45%) despite the fact that Hispanic Catholics backed Clinton over Trump by a 41-point margin (67% to 26%).
Like Hispanic Catholics, religious nones and Jews were strong Clinton supporters. Indeed, nearly seven-in-ten religious nones voted for Clinton, as did 71% of Jews. Most people who identify with faiths other than Christianity or Judaism also favored Clinton over Trump, 62% to 29%.
Exit polls also follow another pattern from recent elections: Most weekly churchgoers backed Trump over Clinton, 56% to 40%. Those who said they attend religious services more sporadically (i.e., somewhere between a few times a month and a few times a year) were closely divided. And, those who said they dont attend religious services at all backed Clinton over Trump by a 31-point margin (62% to 31%).
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/how-the-faithful-voted-a-preliminary-2016-analysis/
In fact most atheists are liberals and Democrats:
Self-identified atheists tend to be aligned with the Democratic Party and with political liberalism. About two-thirds of atheists (69%) identify as Democrats (or lean in that direction), and a majority (56%) call themselves political liberals (compared with just one-in-ten who say they are conservatives). Atheists overwhelmingly favor same-sex marriage (92%) and legal abortion (87%). In addition, three-quarters (74%) say that government aid to the poor does more good than harm.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/06/01/10-facts-about-atheists/
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/06/01/10-facts-about-atheists/
Some day we may actually have an atheist president but that's a long way off. Right now many Americans still seem convinced that people need religion in order to be good so no politican in their right mind is going to admit faith isn't a necessary component of morality.
I think good people would still be good without religious beliefs.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ha - Right-wing website argues Jesus didn't want to help the poor at all [View all]
sharedvalues
Apr 2017
OP
Organized religion today is obsolete and is often injurious to others often making the haters feel
RKP5637
Apr 2017
#2
It's becoming more so all the time. Young people have no use for bronze age belief systems.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2017
#6
Democrats believe in inclusiveness and tolerance, which has everything to do with religion.
rug
Apr 2017
#15
Religious "nones", Jews and other non-Christians overwhelmingly voted for Hillary in 2016:
beam me up scottie
Apr 2017
#16
That's because the GOP voters get votes from some religious people through hate and divisiveness
sharedvalues
Apr 2017
#18
This is why I said liberal ideology has nothing to do with religion.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2017
#21
It is written he that giveth to the poor lendeth to the Lord and the Lord shall pay him again.
caroldansen
Apr 2017
#7
Teresa was no saint if you were unfortunate enough to be sick and poor in Calcutta.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2017
#9
How interesting. A post simltaneously referencing "the Catholic propanganda machine" and
rug
Apr 2017
#13
Well it's not like white Christian males suffered and died or anything.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2017
#25
Oh indeed. Remember when we were attacked for criticizing the nuns at the Tuam orphanage?
beam me up scottie
Apr 2017
#32
Well when you need to market the same old product as 'New and Improved' you need a marketing expert.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2017
#37
More deflection and outright denial of facts. Did you even read the study?
beam me up scottie
Apr 2017
#57
Assume I was referring to the collective 'you' as in the Church and defenders of Teresa in general.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2017
#51
It's not like those nasty old atheists are the only ones who criticized Teresa.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2017
#63
Even former members of her order have spoken up about her negligence.
Act_of_Reparation
Apr 2017
#64
imho, the point of any decent religion is to encourage socially helpful behavior
unblock
Apr 2017
#52