Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
59. because it's not grounded in reality.
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 11:27 AM
Apr 2017

You made it up. Pacifism isn't in any Progressive platform. Sorry.

ALL of them severely restrict the use of the military and constrain military budgets for peace and economic justice, but that doesn't imply let alone state 'pacifism'.


I'd argue I'm more progressive than you are, and I'm not anywhere near a pacifist. For starters, on abortion, I don't do the two-sides-of-my-mouth bullshit and say I'm 'against abortion personally but pro-choice politically'. No. Fuck that. I'm pro-choice period. Personally and politically. I'm also in favor of normalizing the very idea of abortion among other 'hot button' reproductive freedom issues. It's not an 'issue' at all. It's normal. It's a safe (safer than birth) option. It's a morally acceptable option. It's fine. I'm not going to be two-faced and say 'it should be legal, but oh by the way, you're killing someone, if you ask me on a personal level.'. I'm not going to insist it be legal while also fomenting guilt trips for people who utilize it, as if there's something wrong with the concept.

Another voice in the din; shame... shame.... shame...

Well, shame on you. To express it right here on DU even.

And I don't have ANY trouble speaking on this issue as a male either. Guess what. I authorized the destruction of 9 fertilized embryos, because the 'I believe it's murder' contingent made it such an issue that our IVF facility had to add legal indemnification in triplicate so they could destroy un-used fertilized blastocysts on our authority as the biological parents. So yes, even as a male I absofucking-lutely have aborted living fertilized embryos. And I'd do it again, because it has NO moral implications. Attempting to implant and carry all 9 would have had negative moral implications, you bet, but terminating them? Nope. Not gonna fucking apologize and I am aware of my privilege, as a male, because people like you probably don't remember to foment guilt toward people like me, even though what I did was not morally different than a woman going to a medical facility for a D&X abortion.

I think people who hold this bullshit 'its bad but it should be legal' position are actually the worst. The fucking worst. People that can flow between the two sides of this issue and sow fear and doubt and second-guessing while pretending to be pro-life, but casting all sorts of shade on the actual employment of the procedure.

Please re-evaluate your position.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I would love to know ExciteBike66 Apr 2017 #1
One could ask them, as they are helping the poor. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #3
One could ask them, and helping the poor has nothing to do with it. ExciteBike66 Apr 2017 #5
What makes anyone a progressive? guillaumeb Apr 2017 #7
It's easier to come at it the opposite way... ExciteBike66 Apr 2017 #8
Are you a single issue voter? guillaumeb Apr 2017 #9
Why does supporting human rights for women make one a 'single issue voter'? beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #13
And pacifism? guillaumeb Apr 2017 #16
This isn't about pacifism, it's about forcing women to give birth. beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #18
I answered this. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #19
You said support for reproductive rights makes one a single issue voter. beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #23
Yes, it is a grave injustice no one wants to discuss yet another attempt to move the goalposts. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2017 #32
The sub thread was pure speculation of motives, with no evidence offered guillaumeb Apr 2017 #48
You don't need to assume anything. I flat out told you why people aren't discussing it. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2017 #50
You avoided the substance of my reply. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #53
because it's not grounded in reality. AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #59
Beautiful reply. n/t Fix The Stupid Apr 2017 #63
Your post is a thing of beauty, one of those rare posts that make me remember why I joined. beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #64
Nicely done. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2017 #66
Well, go add pacifism to the platform for Progressives, because it's not in there. AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #55
Well, some posters here are claiming that I called one group progressive when I did not. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #56
Well, to me, progressive is all about jelly beans. Because I said so. AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #60
They are Catholic nuns. trotsky Apr 2017 #65
Dismissive of you, but hardly convincing. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #67
The OFFICIAL POLICY of their church is anti-choice. trotsky Apr 2017 #68
Wrong. You and another made a claim that you refuse to back up. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #69
My claim is that they follow Catholic dogma, because they are Catholic nuns. trotsky Apr 2017 #72
Again, you failed to prove your assumption. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #73
Keep trying. trotsky Apr 2017 #74
Wow. Do you buy straw by the bale, or by the wagon load? guillaumeb Apr 2017 #75
Aw, you gave up. trotsky Apr 2017 #87
at a Dem booth at a local fair during the Kerry run for Prez... redwitch Apr 2017 #76
The official policy of the Church is anti-abortion. lapucelle Apr 2017 #79
Actually, denying communion for pro-choice Catholic politicians has been raised in the past. trotsky Apr 2017 #86
It's interesting that certain men in the hierarchy lapucelle Apr 2017 #88
Again, I don't dispute the existence of pro-choice Catholics... trotsky Apr 2017 #89
I don't dispute that no convent lapucelle Apr 2017 #90
Post removed Post removed Apr 2017 #91
No Presidents in the history of this nation ExciteBike66 Apr 2017 #14
Does helping he poor cancel out encouraging conditions that make them poor? Lordquinton Apr 2017 #10
Your questions need much refinement. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #49
Fine. Do good works cancel the bad? Lordquinton Apr 2017 #70
Too simplistic. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #71
How about an answer Lordquinton Apr 2017 #80
Teaching people to turn away from Reason, makes them stupid and poor Bretton Garcia Apr 2017 #81
What an amazing response. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #84
I've worked for the poor all my life Bretton Garcia Apr 2017 #92
Your framing. Valid only as proof of your own opinion. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #93
Data verifies link between poverty and fundamentalism Bretton Garcia Apr 2017 #94
Given that approximately 84% of humans are believers, guillaumeb Apr 2017 #95
Religious Reagan, Bushes, grew the wealth differential Bretton Garcia Apr 2017 #96
Mainly, I believe, due to abortion. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #97
Catholics are typically fairly evenly split Bretton Garcia Apr 2017 #99
If you're basing your argument on imaginary things Lordquinton Apr 2017 #98
On cue. rug Apr 2017 #100
Yes you are Lordquinton Apr 2017 #103
What are you? rug Apr 2017 #104
Do you have something to say? Lordquinton Apr 2017 #105
I love that story. rug Apr 2017 #106
Here we go again, making a mountain out of a molehill! demosincebirth Apr 2017 #77
I work with nuns, and those I know are quite progressive. lapucelle Apr 2017 #78
Nuns are often better than Chaput Bretton Garcia Apr 2017 #82
Chaput is one extreme voice among many. lapucelle Apr 2017 #83
Yep. Cardinal Law... Bretton Garcia Apr 2017 #85
"Being against abortion is not always the same as being anti-choice" ExciteBike66 Apr 2017 #101
These terms are slippery and often used interchangeably, lapucelle Apr 2017 #102
I'm reminded of Sister Corita Kent chia Apr 2017 #2
Thank you. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #4
You're welcome. :) chia Apr 2017 #6
The Church gives - and takes away from the poor. Bretton Garcia Apr 2017 #11
I believe that you are confusing religion and class systems. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #12
Your church opposes the use of birth control, trotsky Apr 2017 #15
Not.......my.........church. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #17
Oh really? What church do you belong to? trotsky Apr 2017 #22
Social justice. Like access to family planning. AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #27
I was. Emphasis on the past tense. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #36
Ok. AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #39
Religion educates people in how to think - or not think Bretton Garcia Apr 2017 #20
An interesting viewpoint. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #21
Public education is more modern, less medieval Bretton Garcia Apr 2017 #24
Yes, public schools indoctrinate people, into 'non-barbarism'. Thanks for that. AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #26
Are you seriously asking? guillaumeb Apr 2017 #34
My son's public school has shredded (this semester) Columbus and American manifest destiny/exception AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #37
I am not currently in school. But I have seen relatively recent textbooks on history. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #40
Absolutely. The demographics differences between WA and TX are as long as your arm. Longer, actually AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #42
We homeschooled our children. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #44
Yeah, I get that. But it's not an issue here. AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #52
How do public schools 'indoctrinate' children? beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #31
#34. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #35
Rule... 34? AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #38
Post #34 guillaumeb Apr 2017 #41
*whew* AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #43
SO what is rule 34? guillaumeb Apr 2017 #45
Unsubstantiated allegations. beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #46
Neither was I. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2017 #47
Churches stripped Reason from poor people Bretton Garcia Apr 2017 #51
This sounds like part of a rather formulaic dystopic novel. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #54
The Church already did: the Bible, with its Apocalypse Bretton Garcia Apr 2017 #57
When you write this novel, will your narrator be as condescending guillaumeb Apr 2017 #58
OK. Less condescending. But with smaller words. Bretton Garcia Apr 2017 #61
Condescending is still too big. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #62
"Mother Teresa of Philadelphia" Not a good sign. AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #25
I have to ask (entirely off-topic)... NeoGreen Apr 2017 #28
No, it's the title of a book by Howard Schultz, but I think it apropos for the state of post-primary AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #29
Corporations have souls...?... NeoGreen Apr 2017 #30
Oh, most likely funnier. The book is not super funny at all. AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #33
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Progressive people of fai...»Reply #59